0
Under popular sovereignty who decides whether slavery would be allowed in a territory?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
popular sovereignty
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Under popular sovereignty, the residents of the territory would ultimately decide whether slavery would be allowed. This principle meant that the people living in a particular territory would determine their own laws and institutions, including the decision on the legality of slavery.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who will decide whether slavery would be allowed in a territory under popular sovereignty?
Under popular sovereignty, the decision on whether slavery would be allowed in a territory is typically made by the residents of that territory through a vote or referendum. This allows the people living in the area to determine the status of slavery based on majority rule.
According to the idea of popular sovereignty which of the following would decide whether slavery would be allowed in a territory?
According to the idea of popular sovereignty, the residents of a territory would decide whether slavery would be allowed through a vote or referendum. The principle is based on the belief that the power and legitimacy of the government stem from the consent of the people living in that area.
People living in a territory had the right to decide by voting if slavery be allowed?
Popular sovereignty is the principle that residents of a territory have the right to decide whether slavery should be permitted through a direct vote. It was a compromise proposed as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 to settle the debate over the extension of slavery into new territories.
Why did popular sovereignty in fact lead to Bleeding Kansas instead of settling the issue of slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska territory?
Popular sovereignty allowed each territory to decide on the issue of slavery through a popular vote. This led to intense and violent conflicts like Bleeding Kansas because pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers flooded the territory to sway the vote in their favor, resulting in armed confrontations and confusion. The inability to peacefully settle the issue in Kansas-Nebraska demonstrated the limitations and flaws of popular sovereignty as a solution to the slavery debate.
What does popular sovereignty mean in regards to the spread of slavery into territories?
Popular sovereignty is the idea that the residents of a territory should have the right to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. This concept was influential in the debate over the spread of slavery into new territories during the mid-19th century in the United States, particularly with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 which allowed for popular sovereignty in those territories.
Did the north like popular sovereignty?
No most northerners did not like popular sovereignty because it violated the Missouri compromise. The South was in favor of popular sovereignty because it allowed the people to decide if slavery would be allowed in a new territory.
The concept that a territory should be allowed to decide wheather to have slavery was known as?
popular sovereignty
The concept that a territory should be allowed to decide whether to have slavery known as?
Popular sovereignty
People living in a territory had the right to decide by voting if slavery be allowed?
Popular sovereignty is the principle that residents of a territory have the right to decide whether slavery should be permitted through a direct vote. It was a compromise proposed as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 to settle the debate over the extension of slavery into new territories.
Who will decide whether slavery would be allowed in a territory under popular sovereignty?
Under popular sovereignty, the decision on whether slavery would be allowed in a territory is typically made by the residents of that territory through a vote or referendum. This allows the people living in the area to determine the status of slavery based on majority rule.
What was meant by popular sovereignty?
Popular sovereignty is when a majority vote within a region or state determines its policies. The Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854 allowed popular sovereignty to decide whether a territory was to be a free state or a slave state.
Why was popular sovereignty so well-supported as a just and fair way to settle the slavery question?
Popular sovereignty was well supported because it allowed the local citizens of a territory to decide if slavery was to be allowed or illegal. Stephen A. Douglas pushed for popular sovereignty during the 1840's.
What idea was that Citizens of each new territory should be allowed to decide if they wanted to permit slavery?
Popular Sovereignty
What is the practice of allowing each territory to decide for itself whether or not to allow slavery?
the sovereignty of each state, known as popular sovereignty
The people of each territory were allowed to decide whether it should be free or slave?
The Great Debate. I think.. (New respondent) Popular Sovereignty
According to the idea of popular sovereignty which of the following would decide whether slavery would be allowed in a territory?
According to the idea of popular sovereignty, the residents of a territory would decide whether slavery would be allowed through a vote or referendum. The principle is based on the belief that the power and legitimacy of the government stem from the consent of the people living in that area.
What term means to vote for or against slavery in a territory?
Popular sovereignty is the term that means people could determine, through voting themselves, where to allow slavery in a territory. Another term used is sovereignty of the people.
