0
The outcome of actions. Utilitarianism comes so perilously close to the Machiavellian idea that the means justify the end, it is hard to accept as an ideal ethical or moral philosophy. The major problem with utilitarianism is that by waiting for the out come of ones action, that person doesn't have any reliable standard by which to decide what is good or bad and can only wait and see. This can mean a lot of apologizing and cleaning up messes afterward. It is somewhat like gambling with ethics, a moral lottery ticket, that if in the end turns out all right, then jackpot!, if not, oh well, better luck next time. Morality and ethics is not the realm of lucky people, it is the field of those who have endeavored to take responsibility for their own actions, the actions of others, and for those unforeseen events that require responsibility be taken. Hardly a game for people who rely on luck.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is the theory that holds that actions that generate greater happiness are judged to be better than actions that lead to unhappiness?
This theory is known as utilitarianism. It asserts that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome in terms of promoting overall happiness or pleasure and reducing suffering or pain. Utilitarianism focuses on maximizing the overall well-being of all individuals affected by a particular action or decision.
How is erikson and kohlberg different?
Erikson's theory of psychosocial development focuses on the crises individuals face at different stages of life and how they shape personality. Kohlberg's theory of moral development, on the other hand, looks at how individuals develop their understanding of morality through stages of reasoning and moral dilemmas. While Erikson's theory is broader and includes both social and emotional development, Kohlberg's theory specifically focuses on moral reasoning.
The social scientist who criticized the theory of Lawrence Kohlberg and developed an alternative theory on the development of morality based on personal relationships was?
Carol Gilligan, who proposed a different perspective of moral development that emphasizes the role of caring, compassion, and relationships in shaping one's ethical decision-making. Her theory focuses on the moral reasoning of women and highlights the importance of interpersonal connections in the development of morality.
How Freud piaget kohlberg gilligan mead and erikson theories differ?
Freud's theory focuses on the unconscious mind and how it influences behavior, Piaget's theory emphasizes cognitive development through stages, Kohlberg's theory explores moral development stages, Gilligan's theory offers an alternative perspective on moral development with a focus on care and relationships, Mead's theory examines how society shapes identity, and Erikson's theory outlines stages of psychosocial development throughout the lifespan. Each theory offers a unique perspective on different aspects of human development and behavior.
What is moral school of thought?
The moral school of thought refers to different perspectives and theories that attempt to provide guidelines for determining right and wrong actions. This could include utilitarianism, which focuses on maximizing overall happiness, deontology, which emphasizes following principles or duties, and virtue ethics, which prioritizes developing good character traits. These schools of thought help individuals navigate ethical dilemmas and make decisions in accordance with their values.
Moral theory that focuses mainly on consequences?
Utilitarianism
Which moral theory focuses mainly on an act being universalizable Relativism Virtue ethics Utilitarianism Deontology?
DEONTOLOGY100% Sure
What is the definition of deontology?
de·on·tol·o·gy (dē'ŏn-tŏl'ə-jē)n.Ethical theory concerned with duties and rights.Deontology is also the moral theory that focuses mainly on one's intentions.Deontology is also a moral theory that focuses mainly on an acy of being universalizable.Above retrieved from Answers.ocmViper1
Is utilitarianism is an egoistic moral theory?
Yes
What is teleological moral theory?
Teleological moral theory is a theory that judges the morality of an action based on its consequences or outcomes. It focuses on the end result or goal of the action rather than the action itself. Common forms of teleological moral theories include consequentialism and utilitarianism.
Is Deontology a moral theory that focuses mainly on one's intentions?
Yes, deontology is a moral theory that places emphasis on the intent behind one's actions rather than the consequences. It asserts that the moral rightness of an action is determined by adherence to rules or duties, rather than the outcomes of those actions.
Does utilitarianism succeed as a moral theory?
Yes. In both popularity and effectiveness.
Is rule utilitarianism an ethical theory that promotes establishing moral guidelines using specific rules?
true
A moral theory that focuses mainly on how to be not on what to do?
Virtue ethicsThe idea is to focus on developing the most virtuous character, rather than on what to do and what not to do. It's what you are on the inside that counts.
What is the concept of mill utilitarianism about?
Mill utilitarianism, proposed by philosopher John Stuart Mill, emphasizes that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by the amount of pleasure or happiness it produces for the greatest number of people. It differs from classical utilitarianism by also considering the quality of pleasure, valuing higher pleasures over lower pleasures. Mill believes that actions should aim to maximize overall well-being and promote individual autonomy and personal development.
What is character based theory?
focuses on the moral character of the person performing action
What theory focuses on the beliefs attitudes and moral values of those in power?
social reaction
