Want this question answered?
That atoms were indivisible.
Thomsons model (plum pudding model of negatively charged particles in a positive soup) differed from Daltons model. Dalton hypothesised that atoms were indivisible, the word atom comes from the Greek atomos cannot be cut)
Refer to the related link.
All is true; theory of Leukippus and Democritus was 2 500 yers ago only a theretical (but correct) supposition.
Correct: ''the atoms of the element X are isoelectronic with the ions of the element Y".
That atoms were indivisible.
The idea that atoms are indivisible.
The idea that atoms are indivisible and indestructible, and the idea that all atoms of the same element have the same mass.
atoms are indivisible,tiniest particles of matter. they combine in simple whole no ratios to form elements or compounds. they can neither be created, nor destroyed.
John Dalton's atomic theory indicated that atoms were indivisible spheres. When JJ Thomson did his work with cathode ray tubes, he discovered that atoms contain electrons, which meant that the atom is not indivisible, that there are smaller particles within
dalton was wrong about atoms being indivisible. atoms are divisible into several subatomic particles. dalton was wrong about all atoms of a given element having identical properties.
Thomsons model (plum pudding model of negatively charged particles in a positive soup) differed from Daltons model. Dalton hypothesised that atoms were indivisible, the word atom comes from the Greek atomos cannot be cut)
JJ Thomson's discovery of electrons indicated that atoms were not indivisible.
Refer to the related link.
No. Atoms are now considered to consist of several minor particles. And atoms dividing is what provides the energy for nuclear power plants. So atoms are NOT indivisible. They ARE divisible.
You can't have .78 of an atom - atoms are indivisible.
Atoms may not be changed into other atoms.