us interference
Iraq, The Gulf Of Mexico...etc.
Never. Iraq is much like Mexico: they are too brown to make reasonable decisions.
No, but i think one is in Mexico actually, there isn't one in Mexico. only in Egypt, turkey,Greece, and Iraq
Canada china Iraq Australia Africa Mexico jamaca
Even more, if you think of it. Remember Iraq or Enron?
Countries like south-east Asia, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines and Vietnam
Same distance as Mexico to the USA. Zero. They are right next to each other.
distance from Krakow to Iraq 1703 miles from Warsaw to Iraq 1755 miles from Lodz to Iraq 1789 miles from Wroclaw to Iraq 1849 miles (source: timeanddate.com) == ==
No. The Tigris River crosses the Middle Eastern countries of Turkey, Syria and Iraq, flowing into the Persian Gulf.
It's not. The war against Mexico was to take California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and New Mexico as US territory (US property). This was done. The war against North Vietnam was to stop them from trying to conquer South Vietnam; which was not done.
Both conflicts started by hawkish members of Congress accusing the enemy of shedding American blood (Mexico) or conspiring against the US (Iraq) without tangible proof of such asseveration. Both were unjustified invasions of sovereign countries to acquire their resources; either land (Mexico) or oil (Iraq). Both were fought for the benefit of power-hungry, unscrupulous rich people; either slave owners (Mexico) or oil tycoons (Iraq). In the case of Mexico, Lincoln was appalled because the United States was founded on the principles of democracy and freedom, but it performed a show of force against a weaker neighbor to grab its resources, like many European powers did at the time. This was seen by him as a hypocritical action.