0
Was farming in the middle colonies a better economic choice than farming in New England?
There was more land and fertile soil in the Middle colonies than there was in the New England
What else can I help you with?
How did the crops grown by farmers in the middle colonies differ from those grown in the New England?
the soil in the middle colonies was better for farming than the soil in New England. also the climate was milder,and the growing season was longer
How did crops grown by farmers in the middle colonies differ from those grown in new England?
the soil in the middle colonies was better for farming than the soil in New England. also the climate was milder,and the growing season was longer
Why was England better suited for war than were the colonies?
The England army were better trained because the colonies army were a bunch of farmers.
What made the New England colonies better?
the New England colonies were 'suposably' better due to the fact that they were very religious and they were the largest supplier of food/crops for the rest of the America's. But none of the Colonies are "better" because the southern was the 'best' farmer. Middle colonies were the 'best' at manufacturing. and the new england colonies was the better textile related colony.
Why were the southern colonies better for growing crops than new England colonies?
New England colonies had land that was mainly filled with rocks, or sand.
How were farms in the middle colonies different from the colonies in New England?
The middle colonies had good soil and were able to produce cash crops. This means they grew enough to sell and make a profit. The New England colonies were only able to grow enough for a family or just a bit trade or to sell, but not as much as the middle colonies did. They had to go to other things like fishing and building boats.
What did new England colonies and southern colonies have in common?
they both had to worck and they came for a better way of life
How was the economy of north and south tied together?
The Northern colonies (or New England colonies) practiced subsistence farming. Some of the world's best fishing grounds were discovered near here. They had lots of lumber to sell. Basically, they sold their resources for money. The Southern colonies had plantations. They typically grew rice, tobacco, and other things. They were introduced to slaves, and became the "slave region." There were many economic and social issues with their use of slaves. It set the Southern colonies on a different path than the Middle and New England colonies. North - Richer - better jobs. South - Poorer - not much education.
What factors made slavery more beneficial to the southern colonies than the New England colonies or the middle colonies?
In the southern colonies, the land was better for growing crops, so there were a lot more farms and plantations. Because there were so many farms and plantations, these places needed more cheap easy labor. In the New England colonies, the soil was rocky, and not good for farming. In the Middle colonies, there was some farming, but not a lot.Answer (OCinneide)The northern colonies were primarily industrial based while the south was primarily agricultural. The north needed skilled labor which could not be supplied by slave labor, while the cheap unskilled slave labor was very useful to the farmers and plantation owners of the south.
Why did southern colonies have more plantations than new England?
Farming was better because of the year long climate, more farm land, and cotton was able to be produced.
What colonies was it easy to make a living farming in?
The middle colonies offered religious freedom to those of all faiths, and the climate and geography were better for farming, as well as fishing and shipping. In addition, because so many people chose to live in the middle colonies, they were good places for businesses.
Why did some Massachusetts bay colonist form new colonies?
They colonists formed new colonies because of religious reasons and wanted better farmland.
