Texians wanted to keep Texas as a slave state. See related questions.
No - there was no slavery in the new territories - California or New Mexico or Utah. Texas was a slave state already.
Wisconsin was not a slave state.
A slave state.
Slave state is a state that was FOR slavery back in the day.
1848.
Yes, Texas as a Republc, as a US State, and as a Confederate state was a slave state. Mexico had abolished slavery in 1826 and if a Texas slave could make it across the river they were free to become colonists in Mexico.
Texas was a slave holding Republic and would become a slave holding state.
In the Compromise of 1850, the Mexican Cession territory (excluding California) was to become New Mexico and Utah. Their slave situations were to be determined using popular sovereignty, or the power of the votes of the people to decide if it would be a slave state or not. In addition, the Compromise of 1850 also gave the disputed territory between Texas, a slave state, and New Mexico to New Mexico. This invalidated the previous compromise, the Missouri Compromise, which banned slavery in North of 36 in newly gained territory.
No. They did not become states until decades after slavery ended in the US Civil War. However.. When statehood was first proposed for the New Mexico Territory in 1850, slavery would have been prohibited there. In 1860, Northern Republicans were anxious to avoid Southern secession, and offered to admit New Mexico as a slave state. But it was too little, too late. New Mexico did not finally become a state until 1912, and was the 47th US state.
It would have to enter as a slave state. And they didn't want a war with Texas and Mexico.
Texians wanted to keep Texas as a slave state. See related questions.
Slave state
Mississippi was a slave state until the end of the Civil War.
Wisconsin was not a slave state.
no canada was not a slave state
No - there was no slavery in the new territories - California or New Mexico or Utah. Texas was a slave state already.