0
Was one of the framers of the Constitution whose name was Jared Ingersoll a slave owner?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Franklin, Washington, and Madison
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the name of the subway owner?
Jared
Why was Franklin Pierce a popular candidate for the South?
Although Pierce was not a slave-owner he understood that slavery was a long-established institution in the South when the Constitution was drawn up and that the northern states accepted that fact when they ratified the Constitution.
How did taney iinterpret the constitution in the Dred Scott Case?
In the way that it was originally written by slave-owner Jefferson. It declared that a man's property was sacred, and that included slave-property.
Third Amendment of the Constitution of the US?
"No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law." This amendment prohibited the housing of soldiers in private homes during peacetime without the owner's consent.
What is a good name to name a jewelry business?
You should pick a name that appeals to you, not one that some anonymous person likes! Most jewelry stores are named after the owner, such as Zales or Jared, but you can make up a cute name if you wish. However, that should be based on yourpersonality and your tastes.
Quartering troops is restricted in the constitution quartering troops means?
The Third Amendment of the Constitution forbids the quartering of troops. This means, troops can't be forcibly housed in private homes without the owner's permission. This amendment was created due to the British forcibly housing soldiers in private homes during the Revolutionary War.
Who was the president who endorsed the Lecompton Constitution?
The Lecompton Constitution was one of several state constitutions proposed to the US Congress for approval by the territory of Kansas, as it sought to become a US state. President James Buchanan, although he was not the president at the time, was a supporter of the Lecompton Constitution, which would have preserved slave-owner rights in the new state. Kansas was admitted as a free state in 1861, due to the opposition of abolitionists living their at the time.
Should aliens enjoy the same due process rights as American citizens?
The short answer to the question is that on American soil, aliens subject to the American Justice System do enjoy the same due process rights as American Citizens. Admittedly, everyone has an opinion and as a general rule, it is important to consider the opinions of others. Having said that, it is equally advisable not to accept the opinion of one who is not an authority on the subject. As an authority on the subject, I can tell you unequivocally that the idea that the Constitution of the United States protects American Citizens much more than it does those who are not citizens is one of the most widely pervasive myths currently circulating. The Constitution does extend certain benefits to citizens. For instance, Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 provides, inter alia, that "[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President ..." I cite this particular provision because it provides important definitional context. On its face, this paragraph states, with an exception for those who were Citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, that only natural born Citizens are eligible to become President. However, note the use of the word "Person" as well as the use of the word "Citizen." Definitionally speaking, a Citizen is a sub set of a Person. In other words, not all Persons are Citizens, but all Citizens are Persons. Now, read the entire Bill of Rights and count how many times the words Citizen, Person, or the people is used. Ist Amendment "... the people ..." Once. IInd Amendment "... the people ..." Once. IIIrd Amendment "... the Owner ..." Once. IVth Amendment "... the people ... the persons ..." Once each. Vth Amendment "... person ..." Twice. VIth Amendment "... the accused ..." Once. VIIth Amendment None. VIIIth Amendment None. IXth Amendment "... the people ..." Once. Xth Amendment "... the people." Once. Within the Bill of Rights, some variation of the word "person" appears eight times. The word "the Owner" and the word "the accused" each appear once. However, the word "Citizen" does not appear a single time in the entire Bill of Rights. In contrast and as I noted above, the words "Person" and "Citizen" were used in the same sentence within Article II, Section I, paragraph 5. This fact shows that the framers intentionally distinguished between these two words. Moreover, the framers used the word "Citizen" specifically when they wanted to limit a particular benefit to only Citizens. This being the case, the converse must also be true. In other words, every time the framers chose the word "Person", it reflects an intentional decision not to use the word "Citizen." Thus, it can be stated unequivocally that the framers intended the rights guaranteed to "Persons" to be so guaranteed irrespective of citizenship. The power derived from a written constitution is lasting, in part, because it is in fact written. Words have specific meanings and we must always presume that the use of each specific word was intentional. With regard to the Constitution of the United States of America, a plain reading makes it clear that the specific use of the words "the Owner", "the accused", "Citizen" and "person" or some variation thereof, was wholly intentional. In order to honor the framers of the Constitution, and in order to preserve what they created, we must give force and effect to each and every word within the Constitution. In other words, the rights guaranteed within the Bill of Rights are guaranteed to persons, to the accused, and to the Owner regardless of whether they are American Citizens. To view a transcript of the Preamble as well as Articles I through VII, a transcript of the 1st through the 10th Amendments, also known as the Bill of Rights, and a transcript of the 11th through the 27th Amendments, access the links under Related Links, below.
Can a solider be in the home of a private citizen?
The US Constitution, Amendment III states, "No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
Can a husband evict a wife who has cancer from the property they own?
No. One owner cannot evict the co-owner of the property.No. One owner cannot evict the co-owner of the property.No. One owner cannot evict the co-owner of the property.No. One owner cannot evict the co-owner of the property.
Who is an ostensible owner?
Ostensible owner is the one who is not the real owner but is permitted by the true owner to act on his behalf.
Who pays taxes on a reverse mortgage home that is no longer lived in?
The owner of the property.The owner of the property.The owner of the property.The owner of the property.
