Without a doubt, the 19th century industrialist served a higher purpose in the growth of new industries and inventions. Yes, there were problems but the end results placed most Americans at a higher standard of living and the industrialists produced new jobs.
It was beneficial.
they were beneficial because they fought wars to protect their people.
Altering the environment has consequences whether beneficial or harmful.
It depends on your point of view: The truth, I suspect, was that it's a bit of both. But then it's easy for me to say the British were not the worst Imperial masters in history: I've never had a foreigh soldier telling me what to do in my own country !
The plebeian tribunes, the representatives of the plebeians , could block the actions of the executive officer of state if he seemed them to be against the interests of the plebeians or harmful to them. They could also veto the seantum consultum. This was a deliberation of the senate on policy matters which had an advisory character for the consuls, the two annually elected heads of the Republic.
Most believe that the actions of the industrialists were more beneficial to the United States. The good things outweighed the bad things.
the harmful and the beneficial effects of advertising?
These are fairly central in Buddhism. Karma (kamma) is the view that actions have similar repercussions, either in this life or in future lives. For example, harmful actions have negative repercussions, and beneficial actions have positive repercussions.So one can help ensure a pleasant reincarnation by performing beneficial actions and abstaining from harmful actions.The ultimate goal of Buddhism is the cessation of suffering and reincarnation. This is known as nibbana (nirvana).
Harmful.
Cows are very beneficial.
it is a beneficial plant
Gasoline
beesk
examples of harmful liquids
it depends on the type of the bacteria. also beneficial bacterias outnumber the population of harmful bacterias.
It is not harmful. it is making food forall creatures.
Harmful.