No. It's most ironical - both sides were equally unsatisfied with it. But 'equally' is your clue. It balanced the situation, and kept the peace for thirty years.
They made the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850.
the Missouri compromise
The Missouri Compromise provided that no Slave State could be established to the north of a line represented by the parallel 36° 30' coincident with the Southern boundary of Missouri.
No. It kept the peace for thirty years. Neither side was satisfied with it. Fortunately, they were both equally dissatsfied, and this kept the balance.
there was no slavery allowed
The Missouri Compromise was done in 1820. The Missouri Compromise decided North and South Power.
They made the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850.
the Missouri compromise
south
The Missouri Compromise provided that no Slave State could be established to the north of a line represented by the parallel 36° 30' coincident with the Southern boundary of Missouri.
The Missouri Compromise (1820)
no because after the Missouri compromise it was prohibited to have slaves north of Missouri
No. It kept the peace for thirty years. Neither side was satisfied with it. Fortunately, they were both equally dissatsfied, and this kept the balance.
All states north of the 36-30 parallel, except Missouri itself
It would allow slavery to spread north of the line established by the Missouri compromise. - Novanet
The Missouri Compromise splits the early America into the South (where slavery is upheld) and the North ( Where slavery is banned)
there was no slavery allowed