0
It tells how its unfair and wrong nobody should have to be told what to do and have to do it , the right way as if there life depended on it because then it did.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agothe 3 parts are
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How are slaves and slavery referred to in the Constitution?
A slave was 3/4 of a person in the constitution when population was counted for the house.
According to Article you Section 2 of the Constitution how were slaves to be counted when determining the number of congressional districts per state?
3/5 of the population of slaves were counted for each state
What compromise was eventually reached about slavery in the US constitution?
The Constitution had three main compromises about slavery: -- The 3/5 compromise allowed states to count slaves as residents when apportioning the House of Representatives, but only at the rate of 3 residents counted for every 5 slaves. -- The partial ban on slave traffic allowed the international slave trade to continue for 20 years. Under Article 1, section 9, Congress is prevented from prohibiting the importation of slaves, before 1808. -- The Fugitive Slave Clause (Article 4, section 2) which required the return of escaped slaves to their masters.
What fraction of slaves were counted in a state?
five slaves will be counted as 3 people
How many Black people were involved in writing the Constitution?
None, in 1789 African Americans were slaves. They were forbidden by law to read and write. They even needed permission to leave the plantation. Slaves were considered 3/4th of a person when counting population for representatives in the house. They were the largest population, though, in the colonies, but were considered property.
In which 3 parts of the constitution are parts mentioning slaves?
dude i have no idea.
Why do some parts of the constitution have lines through them?
Things are crossed out because certain things in the constitution are now unconstitutional. For instance the area that speaks about slaves being 3/5ths of a person.
How was slaves treated in the constitution?
When determining representation by population, slaves were counted as 3/5ths of a person.
What did the constitution do for the slaves?
Nothing, it made them 3/4 of a person.
What is the fisrt part of the constitution of the Philippines?
3 parts of constitution
How are slaves and slavery referred to in the Constitution?
A slave was 3/4 of a person in the constitution when population was counted for the house.
What are the essential parts of constitution?
1. constitution of liberty 2. constitution of government 3. constitution of sovereignty
What groups of people did the drafters of the constitution ignore?
The Constitution ignored native Americans; women and partially slaves because of the 3/5 provisions.
According to Article you Section 2 of the Constitution how were slaves to be counted when determining the number of congressional districts per state?
3/5 of the population of slaves were counted for each state
Did the civil war begin as a struggle to preserve the US rather than one to free slaves?
No, it began because the norths (anti-slavery) wanted the constitution to say no slavery, while the south (pro-slavery) wanted the constitution to say yes to slavery. What ended happening is that the constitution said states with over a certain amount of people could have slaves. The next question would be whether or not slaves were considered people or citizens of the United States. The 3/5s act came into play, saying that for every 5 slaves in the state, 3 would be counted as a person.
Where does the constitution deal with fugitive slaves?
The Fugitive Slave Clause is found in Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution. This clause was mostly rendered moot by the passage of the 14th Amendment.
What addition was made to the constitution to ensure its ratfication?
The biggest issue which was dodged in the Constitution was the matter of Slavery. The 3/5ths rule (as found in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3) is the compromise between the Northern states (who did not have slaves) and the Southern ones (which did). It gave the Southern states some benefit from slaves for the purpose of Representation in Congress (and apportionment of revenue), while avoiding handing them an overwhelming edge.
