answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The US Supreme Court incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause as a result of their decision in McDonald v. City of Chicago, 261 US ___ (2010).

Although the Privileges and Immunities Clause was originally thought to incorporate the Bill of Rights to the states, the Supreme Court blocked this path with its decision in the first case interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment, The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 US 36 (1873).

In the opinion of the Court, Justice Samuel Miller concluded the Privileges or Immunities Clause protects only those rights "which owe their existence to the Federal government, its National character, its Constitution, or its laws." Justice Samuel Alito summarized the Court's earlier thinking in his recent written opinion for McDonald: "The Court held that other fundamental rights-rights that predated the creation of the Federal Government and that 'the State governments were created to establish and secure' - were not protected by the Clause."

The Court later explicitly refused to apply the Second Amendment to the States in US v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1876), a decision that stood for 134 years.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was used to incorporate the Second Amendment to the states?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was the vehicle for incorporation of rights against the states?

The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses have both been used, but the Due Process Clause is the one most often associated with incorporation.Please note: Under the doctrine of selective incorporation, only the First, Second, Fourth and Sixth Amendments have been fully incorporated; the Fifth Amendment is mostly incorporated; The Third and Eighth Amendments are partially incorporated; the Seventh Amendment is unincorporated. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments, while considered part of the Bill of Rights, are not amenable to the process.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What has the US Supreme Court done with the Bill of Rights one clause at a time?

Using the process of "selective incorporation," the US Supreme Court has applied most of the Bill of Rights to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. The Second and Seventh Amendment have not yet been incorporated.


Which supreme court case was the first to address the second amendement?

United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1875)The US Supreme Court held that gun control regulation was a state's rights issue, and that the Second Amendment didn't apply to the states.[The Second Amendment was subsequently incorporated to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause in McDonald v. Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010), in a decision released June 28, 2010.]


How was the Second Amendment involved in the Supreme Court case US v. Cruikshank?

United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1875)The US Supreme Court held that gun control regulation was a state's rights issue, and that the Second Amendment didn't apply to the states.[The Second Amendment was subsequently incorporated to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause in McDonald v. Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010), in a decision released June 28, 2010.]For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What are a few controversial amendments to the Constitution?

The Second Amendment is one of the few controversial Amendments. It is the right to bear arms and it is one of the most debated and misunderstood. The Fourteenth Amendment is another one which deals with the definition of citizenship.


In what case did the Supreme Court refuse to incorporate the Second Amendment to the States via the 14th Amendment?

United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1876)The US Supreme Court held the Second Amendment only applied to the Federal government, and that gun regulation was a state's rights issue.


Can states regulate a person's second amendment right to bear arms?

The second amendment trumps state law in many court findings. The 14th amendment, also called the Due Process Clause, obligates states and all levels of American government to operate within the law and provide fair procedures.


What could the US Supreme Court have done with the incorporation doctrine?

Yes, the US Supreme Court has used selective incorporation to apply the Bill of Rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses, as such application became relevant. The First, Second, Fourth and Sixth Amendments are fully incorporated; the Fifth is mostly incorporated; the Eighth is partially incorporated; the Third is incorporated only in the Second Circuit; the Seventh is currently unincorporated.If the Court didn't support incorporation the Bill of Rights would have become applicable to the states all at once, or not at all.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What is second amendment called?

The second Amendment.


Has the First Amendment been incorporated to the States by the US Supreme Court?

AnswerYes, the First Amendment has been fully incorporated through the application of the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, under the doctrine of "selective incorporation." The First, Fourth and Sixth are the only Amendments the US Supreme Court has fully incorporated as of 2010, but the Fifth Amendment is mostly incorporated, and the Second Amendment may become incorporated before the end of the 2009-2010 Term in June.First Amendment (incorporated)Everson v. Board of Education, 330 US 1 (1947) clarified the Establishment Clause.Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 US 296 (1940) held that the state couldn't impose restrictions on religious grounds.Gitlow v. New York, 268 US 652 (1925) held that the Fourteenth Amendment required the States to adhere to the First Amendment.Near v. Minnesota, 283 US 697 (1931) held that the Minnesota "gag law" violated freedom of the press.De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 US 353 (1937) held that Oregon's criminal syndicalism law was unconstitutional.NAACP v. Alabama, 357 US 449 (1958) Used Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment to establish the right to expressive association, which is not specifically mentioned in the First Amendment.For more information about the Bill of Rights and selective incorporation, see Related Questions, below.


What did the second amendment say about the right of private individuals to own weapons?

The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. There is some confusion because of the prefatory clause about the militia that has since been clarified by the Supreme Court to have no bearing on the rights of the individuals. In legal words: The Amendment's prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. Read more about the second amendment at the link below.


What US Supreme Court decision incorporated the First Amendment?

The First Amendment has been fully incorporated through the application of the Fourteenth Amendment, under the doctrine of "selective incorporation." Gitlow v. New York, (1925) was the first case that applied a First Amendment Clause to the states.The First, Second, Fourth and Sixth are the only Amendments the US Supreme Court has fully incorporated, as of 2010.Case Citation:Gitlow v. New York, 268 US 652 (1925)First Amendment (incorporated)Everson v. Board of Education, 330 US 1 (1947) clarified the Establishment Clause.Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 US 296 (1940) held that the state couldn't impose restrictions on religious grounds.Gitlow v. New York, 268 US 652 (1925) held that the Fourteenth Amendment required the States to adhere to the First Amendment.Near v. Minnesota, 283 US 697 (1931) held that the Minnesota "gag law" violated freedom of the press.De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 US 353 (1937) held that Oregon's criminal syndicalism law was unconstitutional.NAACP v. Alabama, 357 US 449 (1958) Used Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment to establish the right to expressive association, which is not specifically mentioned in the First Amendment.For more information, see Related Questions, below.