0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Bill of Rights has not been nationalized?
has not been nationalized
What challenges have advances in technology posed for supreme court justices trying to interpret the bill of rights?
There were a few challenges that have advances in technology for Supreme court. This was what interpret the Bill of Rights.
Who interprets the bill of rights to determine what rights you actually have?
The supreme court
How was the US Bill of Rights nationalized?
It wasn't "nationalized", but it is part of the constitution and it is followed as part of the law.
What other groups have turned to the Supreme Court to protect their Civil Rights?
Bill of Rights and The Fourteenth Amendment.
The Supreme Court did not interpret the Fourteenth Amendment as incorporating the Bill of Rights until?
the 1960s
What plays a large role in interpreting the bill of rights?
legislativeAnother View: WRONG! It is the Judicial Branchwhich interprets the Bill of Rights, an integral part of the US Constitution.
Who plays the largest role in interreting the bill of rights?
The court system, headed by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Did the US Supreme Court apply the entire Bill of Rights to the states under doctrine of Total Incorporation?
No. The US Supreme Court used the doctrine of "Selective Incorporation" to apply the Bill of Rights to the States on a clause-by-clause basis, as they became relevant to cases before the Court.
Why is the suprem court there?
The Supreme Court is the ultimate authority on the Constitution. The Supreme Court is responsible for upholding the Bill of Rights. It's part of the judicial branch, which serves as a system of checks and balances for the leglislative and executive offices.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to?
make rights contained in the bill of rights applicable to the states.
Supreme court cases of 1901 that determined that the US Constitution and bill of rights?
Insular cases
