No, all of the countries that were once in the British Empire were all freed at the end of World War 2 as Britain was nearly bankrupt! Also, I don't think France was ever in the British Empire.
The Emancipation Proclamation, however this was in name only, no slaves at all were freed as the Union had no control of Confederate territory and was unable to enforce it.
The Emancipation Proclamation freed those enslaved people who had not already freed themselves in Rebel-held states, but not border states where slavery was also legal.
President Abraham Lincoln freed slaves in rebellious areas of the US in 1863. All other slaves had been freed in the North.
Lincoln had little to do with the requirement to send all freed slaves back to Africa. The experiment of Liberia took place before he was president.
Simon Bolivar was the liberator of South America, totally different continent then South Africa. It's more correct to say that George Washington was like Bolivar and not the other way around. Bolivar armies were made up of not only men but women, and all the different countries, (not just some states) that he liberated the entire continent of South America from Spaniard rule, he not only gave freedom to the privilege classes but to all people. He freed the slaves and gave liberate to all men and women by writing the constitutions for the different countries. George Washington is similar but it has taken years and centuries after Washington for just slavery to be abolish. Simon Bolivar is more best compared to a combination of North American leaders, such as Geroge Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson many others, not just one.
he won all of his but lost 3
Costa Rica and Brazil. That's all I know or think.
Sort of. Simon Bolivar liberated most countries in northern and western South America from Spanish dominion during the 19th century, including Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. In honour, they renamed what had formerly been known as Upper Peru: Bolivia. He attempted to join all these countries into one large federation called Gran Colombia but unfortunately that failed. In an attempt to keep control of Gran Colombia, Simon Bolivar (who had formerly held the title of President) declared himself dictator so he would have absolute power to put down the large number of rebellions and uprising that were going on, especially in Venezuela. So to answer the question, yes. Simon Bolivar became dictator of Gran Colombia, of which Bolivia had been a part of at the time.
Simon Bolivar
lol probably doing the same thing as me the answer is all of above
Bolivar was not as successful in the role of government as he was in the role of general leading a revolution. He insisted on a vision of a "grand Colombia", trying to unite the countries he had liberated from the Spanish rule: Ecuador, Colombia, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela; but only four years after he had liberated Soon thereafter, fighting between the states, personality conflicts, and resentment of his authoritarian ways caused his influence to wane. After an assassination attempt and with failing health, Bolivar resigned all his positions and died shortly thereafter on December 10, 1830.
The 3 used to be part of Simon Bolivar's Great Colombia. Panama and Venezuela share borders with Colombia.All the people speak Spanish In them.
Adolf Hitler helped free Venezuela from Spanish rule, and then backstabbed them. He got all of his Jews from there.
Simon Bolivar was a Venezuelan military and political leader. Bolívar played a key role in Latin America's successful struggle for independence from the Spanish Empire, and is today considered one of the most influential politicians in the history of the Americas. He was known as The Liberator for all of his work.
No countries dominated Western Europe after WW2 as all Nazi-occupied countries were freed and become independent once more.
san martin, miguel higaldo, don Pedro, Simon bolivar this is for all u ap euro kids like me and i hate ap euro