Want this question answered?
Yes, the conventional explosives would trigger an explosion of the conventional explosives inside the nuclear bomb which would blow apart the nuclear components of the nuclear bomb, causing significant alpha emitter radiological contamination but no nuclear yield.
It is a signature which is readable and takes a complete form of letter strokes.
modified block style
Definition of conventional and non conventional energy
Conventional sources are the same as conventional sources.
It depends upon what you mean by "conventional" weapons. However, nuclear weapons are far more devastating than conventional weapons because of their inherent atomic components; further are spread over a larger "target" area, thus wreak more havoc and destruction, as in "fall-out" (the aftermath). Just study your history and see what devastation our atomic bomb wroght upon Japan. Conventional? Probably limited in (their) scope of damage.
The letter that indicates the highest elevation on a map is typically represented by the letter 'A'. This is a conventional symbol used by cartographers to denote the peak or highest point on the map.
This is the technology that is conventional
It is conventional because water is natural
non conventional
The difference between conventional and non conventional energy resources is that conventional energy resources are much more common. An example of a conventional energy resource would be oil, a non conventional energy resource would be solar power.
Whether conventional or non-conventional is better is a matter of opinion and circumstance. Different people have different answers.