Want this question answered?
The difference between a shogun and a samurai is like the difference between a king and a knight.
The danger level of a samurai or a knight is subjective and heavily depends on their individual skills, training, and weaponry. Both the samurai and knight were skilled warriors who had different techniques and combat styles. It is difficult to definitively say that one is more dangerous than the other as it would vary on a case-by-case basis.
brothers from another mother
Viking Samurai Spartan Ninja Pirate Knight Apache Centurion The game is scheduled to be released on June 18th 2010
knight
knight
knight samurai a marine
A samurai is comparable to a medieval knight not just anyone can be one they have to be a descendant from another samurai and they have to train for years. A regular soldier is just anyone who was inlisted or joined the military.
The Japanese Samurai armour was normally wood rather than metal, it was much lighter and a looser fit. Even when the samurai used metal (towards the end of the age of the samurai) armour it did not encase the samurai from head to foot and was far less heavy (and also less protective). Whereas the knight in Europe was more like a modern tank, barely able to walk in full armour and virtually impenetrable to all but crossbow bolts (and in certain circumstances the longbow) the samurai was still as nimble as his lesser adversary but also more protected. Though he was also more vulnerable. Needless to say, neither the heavy armour of the European knight, nor the lighter armour of the Japanese samurai was able to compete with the peasant armed with a gun, thus making these mighty warriors obsolete.
Samurai
The Japanese equivalent to a knight would most likely be a Samurai
the difference they fight different way or else that you