Want this question answered?
Distributive justice focuses on the perceived fairness of outcomes, while procedural justice focuses on the fairness of the process by which decisions are made. In designing pay systems, countries that value distributive justice may prioritize equal pay for equal work, while those that emphasize procedural justice may focus on transparency and employee involvement in pay decisions. Socio-cultural norms and values will also influence how these principles are applied in different countries.
Procedural justice is the process leading up to an outcome (use of organizational resources). Distributive justice is how organization resources are allocated. Here is an example for getting a bonus at work Procedural Justice If you do A, B, and C you will get a bonus. Distributive Justice You did A, B, and C, here is your bonus Distributive Injustice You did A, B, and C, but you're not getting a bonus.
Julian Lamont has written: 'Distributive justice' -- subject(s): Distributive justice
Rawls's distributive justice emphasizes the fair distribution of social and economic goods, such as income and wealth, to ensure equal opportunities for all individuals. Corrective justice, on the other hand, focuses on rectifying injustices or inequalities that may have arisen within society through compensation or redistribution. Both concepts are central to Rawls's theory of justice as fairness, which seeks to create a more just and equitable society.
distributive justice
Carl Knight has written: 'Responsibility and distributive justice' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Responsibility, Distributive justice, Political science
Distributive justice in organizational behavior is a type of organizational justice that focuses on a person's perception that they have received fair compensation for their work (i.e. pay, recognition, better assignments, etc.)
Ben Franklin used the concepts of justice and liberty he learned from:Ben Franklin used the concepts of justice and liberty he learned from:
Manfred Hassebrauck has written: 'Emotionale Konsequenzen distributiver Ungerechtigkeit' -- subject(s): Distributive justice, Equality, Psychological aspects, Psychological aspects of Distributive justice, Psychological aspects of Equality, Psychological aspects of Social justice, Social justice
Aristotle identified four divisions of justice: distributive justice, which concerns the fair distribution of resources and rewards; commutative justice, which focuses on fair exchanges between individuals; legal justice, which involves obeying the laws of the land; and corrective justice, which deals with rectifying wrongs and restoring balance after injustices have occurred.
W. King Mott has written: 'The third way' -- subject(s): Catholic Church, Distributive justice, Political and social views, Religious aspects, Religious aspects of Distributive justice
There are several models of justice, including retributive justice, restorative justice, distributive justice, and procedural justice. These models focus on different aspects of the justice system, such as punishment, restoration, fairness in resource allocation, and ensuring fair procedures in legal processes. Each model has its own principles and goals.