Want this question answered?
The expectancy theory ignores the central role that emotions play on effort and behavior (McShane and Von Glinow).
Goal Theory is the label used in educational psychology to discuss research into motivation to learn. Goals of learning are thought to be a key factor influencing the level of a student's intrinsic motivation.
judgement of fair treatment. it is also share of criticism
For the Motivation-hygiene Theory, which is also called two-factor theory, Herzberg found that job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction acted independently of each other.
Path-goal theory is about fit between motivation, behavior, environment, tasks, and reward (Evans, 1970; House, 1971). It traces its origins to expectancy theory, situational leadership and contingency theory, and builds upon all three. Path-goal theory is therefore about flexibility. From expectancy theory, path-goal finds that motivation works best by encouraging followers in their strengths and rewarding them for their efforts. The leader identifies the development level of the followers as well as the supportive and directive behavior criteria to be filled. In the situational leadership model this corresponds to delegating, supporting, coaching and directing behaviors. Where path-goal deviates from situational leadership is in the leaders need to be able to adapt to the characteristics of the followers and the task at hand. Additionally flexibility is needed not only on the behavior of the leadership in understanding the needs of the followers, but also to the environment the organization is operating as well has the internal workings of the organization itself. This ability to adapt to environment and internal operational parameters is the foundation of contingency theory. The objectives that path-goal theory follows to evaluate the surroundings and personalities are (a) define goals, (b) clarifies path, (c) remove obstacles and provide support. Based in the typology, path-goal theory offers, "…a large set of predictions for how a leader's style interacts with subordinates' needs and the nature of the task. Among other things, it predicts that directive leadership [directive] is effective with ambiguous tasks, that supportive [coaching] leadership is effective for repetitive tasks, that participative [supporting] leadership is effective when tasks are unclear and subordinates are autonomous, and that achievement-oriented [delegating] leadership is effective for challenging tasks." (Northouse, 2004, p. 144) Strength of path-goal typology is therefore based on the situational framework of understanding how achievement-oriented (delegating), participative (supporting), supportive (coaching) and directive (directive) behaviors affect the productivity and satisfaction of the followers. Additionally path-goal theory integrates the motivation principles of expectancy theory with the adaptation to environment and internal organizational parameters of contingency theory. Though flexible in nature, path-goal theory in itself is also complex and counter intuitive; herein lies its criticism. "Path-goal theory encompasses so many interrelated sets of assumptions that it is hard to use this theory in a given organizational setting"
compare and contrast Expectancy Theory and Equity Theory
Content theories of motivation focus on the specific factors that motivate individuals, such as needs and desires, while process theories focus on the cognitive processes that explain how motivation occurs, such as goal-setting and reinforcement. Content theories offer insights into what motivates people, while process theories offer insights into how motivation works.
both are theories
The Equity Theory of motivation was formulated by J. Stacy Adams in 1963. The theory suggests that people are motivated when they perceive their inputs and outputs to be equitable to those of their peers. When there is a perceived imbalance in this equity, individuals may be motivated to restore balance through various means.
Equity theory of motivation states that people are motivated when they perceive fairness in the distribution of rewards relative to their inputs compared to others. When individuals feel they are being treated unfairly, they are likely to experience distress and may adjust their behavior in response, either by reducing effort or seeking to restore balance. This theory highlights the importance of perception of fairness in motivating and retaining employees.
Expectancy theory can be found in organizational behavior and management literature. It was first developed by Victor Vroom in the 1960s. You can find detailed explanations of the theory in textbooks, academic journals, and online resources related to motivation and leadership.
An equity theory is that which it is believed people obtain job satisfaction and further motivation by comparing their work related load and their salary against that of others in similar firms or positions.
Expectancy theory is a motivation theory that focuses on how individuals make decisions regarding their behaviors based on the expected outcomes. It suggests that people are more likely to be motivated to perform a task or achieve a goal if they believe that their efforts will lead to desirable outcomes. Expectancy theory includes three key components: expectancy (belief that effort will lead to performance), instrumentality (belief that performance will lead to rewards), and valence (value placed on the rewards).
The expectancy theory allows individuals to understand that their effort can lead to performance, which in turn can lead to desired outcomes. It focuses on the link between effort and reward, motivating employees to perform better. This theory also emphasizes the importance of setting challenging but achievable goals.
The answer is Equity Theory.
Some disadvantages of equity theory include its reliance on subjective perceptions, difficulty in measuring inputs and outcomes objectively, and the challenge of balancing individual perceptions of fairness within a group setting. Additionally, the theory may not fully account for external factors impacting perceptions of fairness, such as societal norms or cultural differences.
The source of motivation theory is Frederick Herzberg.