a process theory that focuses on individual preception of how fairly they are treated reletive to others
Equity theory of motivation states that people are motivated when they perceive fairness in the distribution of rewards relative to their inputs compared to others. When individuals feel they are being treated unfairly, they are likely to experience distress and may adjust their behavior in response, either by reducing effort or seeking to restore balance. This theory highlights the importance of perception of fairness in motivating and retaining employees.
The Equity Theory of motivation was formulated by J. Stacy Adams in 1963. The theory suggests that people are motivated when they perceive their inputs and outputs to be equitable to those of their peers. When there is a perceived imbalance in this equity, individuals may be motivated to restore balance through various means.
The Equity Theory of Motivation suggests that individuals are motivated when they perceive their treatment or rewards to be fair compared to others. People strive to maintain a balance between the input (effort) they put into a task and the output (rewards) they receive from it. When there is perceived inequity, it can lead to feelings of resentment or demotivation.
Some disadvantages of equity theory include its reliance on subjective perceptions, difficulty in measuring inputs and outcomes objectively, and the challenge of balancing individual perceptions of fairness within a group setting. Additionally, the theory may not fully account for external factors impacting perceptions of fairness, such as societal norms or cultural differences.
The concept of instinct in motivation theory was replaced by the concept of drive theory. Drive theory suggests that internal physiological needs create a state of tension or arousal that motivates individuals to act in ways that reduce this tension and restore homeostasis.
McGregor's theory of motivation includes two contrasting approaches: Theory X and Theory Y. Theory X assumes that employees are inherently lazy and require strict supervision, while Theory Y suggests that employees are self-motivated and seek out challenges. McGregor believed that an organization's management style should align with Theory Y to encourage employee engagement and creativity.
The Equity Theory of motivation was formulated by J. Stacy Adams in 1963. The theory suggests that people are motivated when they perceive their inputs and outputs to be equitable to those of their peers. When there is a perceived imbalance in this equity, individuals may be motivated to restore balance through various means.
An equity theory is that which it is believed people obtain job satisfaction and further motivation by comparing their work related load and their salary against that of others in similar firms or positions.
The Equity Theory of Motivation suggests that individuals are motivated when they perceive their treatment or rewards to be fair compared to others. People strive to maintain a balance between the input (effort) they put into a task and the output (rewards) they receive from it. When there is perceived inequity, it can lead to feelings of resentment or demotivation.
The answer is Equity Theory.
The source of motivation theory is Frederick Herzberg.
Content theories of motivation focus on the specific factors that motivate individuals, such as needs and desires, while process theories focus on the cognitive processes that explain how motivation occurs, such as goal-setting and reinforcement. Content theories offer insights into what motivates people, while process theories offer insights into how motivation works.
compare and contrast Expectancy Theory and Equity Theory
The writer of the motivation theory is Jim Riley.
equity theorem of motivation was formulated by a.M S Eve b.Linda Goodman c.Sigmund Freud d.J S Adams
what are disadvatage of equity theory
Motivation theory was published in 1943 by Abraham Maslow in his paper titled "A Theory of Human Motivation," which appeared in Psychological Review.
The motivation theory was published in 1959 in Massachusetts.