0
An inductive argument is one in which the conclusion follows probably from the premises. For example:
1. Felix is a cat.
2. Most cats like to play with mice
3. Felix (probably) likes to play with mice
Remember, in inductive arguments, its possible that the conclusion is false even if the premises are true.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?
Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.
What makes an argument inductive?
An argument is considered inductive when the conclusion is based on a series of specific observations or evidence that may support the conclusion but does not guarantee it. Inductive arguments rely on the probability of the conclusion being true rather than its certainty.
What makes an argument an argument?
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
Create an inductive argument Label its parts?
All people who live on the south side are violent
What are Deductive and Inductive argument means?
Deductive reasoning is drawing a specific conclusion from general principles or premises that are known to be true. It aims to provide certainty in the conclusion. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making generalizations or probabilistic conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It aims to provide strong support for the conclusion without guaranteeing absolute certainty.
How is inductive reasoning different from deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning varies from deductive reasoning as follows: 1) inductive reasoning is a reason supporting an argument and 2) deductive reasoning is an argument against an argument.
What are the 4 fundamentals of logic?
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
Is the ontological argument deductive or inductive?
The ontological argument is typically considered a deductive argument. It aims to establish the existence of God by reason alone, starting from the concept of God as a necessary being. It proceeds through logical steps to demonstrate that God's existence is a necessary consequence of His definition.
How Can a strong inductive argument have a false conclusion?
A strong inductive argument can have a false conclusion if the premises are not relevant to the conclusion, even though they may seem to provide strong support. This can happen if there is a flaw in the reasoning or if there is a hidden assumption that is not valid. Strong inductive arguments should have premises that are actually connected to the conclusion in order for the argument to be valid.
When is stong inductive argument uncogent?
A strong inductive argument can be considered uncogent if the premises are not relevant or if there is a problem with the reasoning or structure of the argument. Additionally, if the premises are not true or if there is a lack of sufficient evidence to support the conclusion, the strong inductive argument may be considered uncogent.
What is The technical word for a good inductive argument?
strong
What argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to prove its conclusion?
An inductive argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to conclusively prove its conclusion. Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence, which may support a conclusion but not guarantee its truth.
