Nuclear power is powerful enough to tale over from fossil fuels as its source wont run out for thousands of years, but the problem with it is that for the radioactive waste to decompose or to just stop being radioactive takes thousands of years. Which presents a threat to all life as radiation is highly dangerous and obviously kills.
The waste can be destroyed, but it is incredibly expensive, so is buried deep underground instead. Obviously activists argue about this way of dealing with the waste but there are not really any other options.
Powerstations must be built properly and cost millions or even a billion pounds, all safety checks must be put in place and there must be no slacks in its production as if ever a powerstation goes into meltdown, the results could be disastrous.
So why not Natural Resources? To be honest I'm all up for natural resources, but the demand for power is rapidly increasing, and to suddenly downsize to a lower power source, when the need for energy is growing, is not practical. To supply countries with a sustainable amount of power, fossil fuels and nuclear power seem the only way forward.
Anyway i hope I've helped, if theres anything I've missed or got wrong please correct me!!!
This is one for the Indian Government to answer, or perhaps the Indian nuclear industry
Al Davis was involved in the NFL for six decades.
There are many variables involved. The type and thickness of the wood, the climate and weather, any preservative that has been applied.A well constructed wooden fence can last decades.
jkggkjghghjftdtggvn
It was meant for Stalin not to be involved in the bomb. We spent decades after that in the arms race and you should know how that ended.
Tens of thousands of people have designed & constructed skyscrapers over the decades. Your question is far too broad to be answered with a single individual's name. Is there a specific building you're interested in.
W EASTERLY has written: 'LOST DECADES: DEVELOPING COUNTRIES STAGNATION IN SPITE OF POLICY REFORM'
Some examples of newly industrialized countries (NICs) include South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong. These countries have experienced rapid industrialization and economic growth within the past few decades.
4.5 decades equals 4.5 decades!
The railroad The telegraph. And (ominously) the growth of the cotton trade.
Winston Churchill warned the leaders of the Allies that allowing Stalin to have the eastern part of Germany and the other countries the world would suffer dire consequences for decades. He was completely right. The Allies should have demanded that Stalin free all the countries and Germany and go home. Instead we had a Cold War for 5 decades.
No, you don't need a hyphen. It would be 10 decades or ten decades.