answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There are no other 'related' cases. The US Supreme Court only takes one representative case for review when considering the constitutionality of a law. If, indeed, there even were other cases, ONLY the Mapp v. Ohio case was chosen.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the related cases with Mapp v Ohio?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who were the parties in Mapp v Ohio?

The parties in Mapp v. Ohio were Dolree "Dolly" Mapp, the petitioner/appellant, and the State of Ohio, the respondent/appellee.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What was Dollree Mapp's ethnic heritage?

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)Dollree Mapp was African-American.To view a picture of Dollree Mapp, see Related Links, below.


How did Mapp v Ohio change the Constitution?

Mapp v Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)Mapp v Ohio didn't change the Constitution, it simply incorporated the Fourth Amendment to the states, requiring them to adhere to that portion of the Bill of Rights and to follow the "exclusionary rule" established in Weeks v US, (1914).For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What was the date of the Mapp v Ohio case?

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)The case was argued on March 29, 1961. The US Supreme Court released its decision on June 19, 1961.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Who was the defendant in the mapp v Ohio 1962 case?

The Appellant, or Petitioner, in Mapp v. Ohio was Dolree "Dolly" Mapp, a Cleveland woman convicted of possessing obscene materials after police conducted an illegal search of her home because they thought she was harboring a suspect in the bombing of legendary boxing promoter Don King's home. The Appellee, or Respondent, was the State of Ohio, which was defending a challenge of the state statute under which Mapp was convicted as being constitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.The Fourth Amendment issue was introduced in an Amicus brief written by the ACLU, and not argued as part of the case before the Supreme Court.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Who wrote the majority and dissenting opinions in Mapp v. Ohio?

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the majority opinion, and Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the dissenting opinion.For more information, see Related Questions below.


The Supreme Court case of Mapp v Ohio established the?

exclusionary rule


Who were the lawyers who argued Mapp v. Ohio before the US Supreme Court?

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)Petitioner: MappAttorney: A. L. KearnsAmici: Bernard Berkman (ACLU, argued for reversal of Ohio Supreme Court decision)Respondent: State of OhioAttorney: Gertrude Bauer MahonFor more information, see Related Questions, below.


How does the exclusionary rule under mapp v Ohio 1961 affect the way evidence is used in court?

Yes. Although the Exclusionary Rule applied to federal cases since the decision in Weeks v. US, 232 US 383 (1914), the Supreme Court had resisted applying the rule to the states (Wolf v. Colorado, 338 US 25 (1949)) until the Warren Court held the circumstances presented in Mapp v. Ohio constituted an unacceptable Fourth Amendment infringement.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Was the decision of the Mapp v Ohio case loose or strict construction?

Loose constuction.


Who was the US President during Mapp v. Ohio?

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)The Court heard oral arguments for Mapp on March 29, 1961 and rendered their decision on June 19, 1961, during the first six months of President John F. Kennedy's administration.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Why didn't the Court's decision in Wolf v Colorado protect Mapp in Mapp v Ohio?

hahahhaah 'cause yu sista is from decatur high school & she sucks Luke jackson's dick.