0
they are from the medieval ages...
They are peasants which were not allowed to leave there village in which they lived or to move around freely.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How was it like being a villien in the Medieval times?
I think that a villen is a poor peasant who is ordered to do things the whole year by a lord who had taken over England after the Romans had left. In return of the work that the villiens had done, the lord gave each of the villiens a land to farm for themselves. Some people find these instructions fine for themselves but some peasants find these commands really disgraceful for their country and for themselves because they have no justice and it has no good for themselves. The lord just keeps makind the villiens working and doesn't give them a break at all.
What is a medieval villien?
A villien is a serf or peasant. Villiens were the lowest rank, not much different from being a slave, escpet they had to feed themselves. They sometimes grew crops and tithed part of it to their lord. They also had to pay to use things like a lord's oven for making bread. Their life was hard.
How were serfs and slaves alike and different?
A serf is not owned by anyone, although the word serf is based upon the Latin "servus", meaning slave. It is the land that is owned, and the serfs live on the land, work the land and contribute so much of their output to the coffers of the owner/lord. Initially many serfs were free to leave the land they worked on, although wherever they went (save cities), they would essentially move to someone else's land and contribute to that lord's coffers. This became troublesome during periods of migration to cities, and so serfs became "tied" to the land. This was beneficial to lords who could call on serfs to stand in as pikemen or archers in their lord's army. However they were not able to leave the land they lived and worked on. Many serfs were born and died on the same plot of land.A slave is personal property. And as such, the owner of the slave has paid for an investment and expects the investment to grow. Slaves were mistreated in many cases but treated well in many more. In the US in the late 18th and 19th centuries, a slave was a valuable commodity and thus only the wealthy plantation owners had more than a couple slaves. Poor sharecroppers could not afford a slave, and those that did well enough to purchase a couple slaves could ill afford for them to die or be unable to work because of mistreatment.Serfs, not being personal property, were often seen as expendable by absentee lords who owned vast tracts of land across many countries. The condition of serfdom was technically as such that the serf agreed to work the lands he or she lived on and would abide by the will of his/her lord, and in return, the lord would protect the serf from outside invasion, marauders, barbarians, etc.Like slavery, serfdom was heriditary. Those who bond themselves to serfdom bond their families and future sons and daughters into perpetuity.Certain types of serfs, such as villiens, owned their own land but as a price for this were expected to till the lord's land for so many hours of the day/week. Cottagers were allowed their own homes but did not own any land and were expected to work the lord's land in return for respecting the sovereignty of the house/hut and garden.Many serfs however did not even own the clothes they wore, all of this, the food they ate, the house they lived in, the land they worked, the clothes, animals kept.. everything except their naked selves, were the property of the lord. They were expected to work first for their lords crops and fields, then tend to their own harvest for themselves and their family. Most lords worth any respectability were expected to provide a meal to their serfs.In some ways it was worse to be a serf than a slave. A serf tilled his lord's fields and if their was any time left, he had to till his own. A slave only tilled the master's fields and from these fields a certain allotment went to the slave. Also, a percentage of plantation slaves could attain prestigious in-house positions as nannies, house servants and such. Many serfs, tied to the land as they were, could not expect any other employ than full time crop harvesting, timber felling, fishing his lords streams, mining his lord's mines and hunting game for his lord. However, a serf still carried a level of dignity not afforded to the slave in the Western Hemisphere. He could attend the same church as a lord and would attend the same religious ceremonies and festivities as better classes. He probably worked harder, but was more dignified.
What was life like on the Arabian peninsula during the middle ages?
Depending on your rank in the feudal system , lifestyle varied for each class. At the bottom we had the Peasants or "serfs"/"Villiens" . Peasant's worked crops , animals and crafts . Life was difficult , work started at 3am in the morning. Next we have knights who devoted themselves to protect the king , fiefs , lords etc. Vassals did service to the king in exchange for hommage . Lords and nobles were ranked under the king. Their was to protect the king( so i've heard)
What did villiens eat?
rats and spiders
Were villeins the same as serfs?
* Well, yes, serfs were the same as villiens. They did the same jobs. Working for the land and working for their lord. But, they didnt have to do all the hard work like villiens did. So therefore, i changed my anwser. Villiens were not serfs.. at least i dont think so.......??????
In the Middle Ages what were villiens?
they are evil faries that feed off human and donkey blood
How was it like being a villien in the Medieval times?
I think that a villen is a poor peasant who is ordered to do things the whole year by a lord who had taken over England after the Romans had left. In return of the work that the villiens had done, the lord gave each of the villiens a land to farm for themselves. Some people find these instructions fine for themselves but some peasants find these commands really disgraceful for their country and for themselves because they have no justice and it has no good for themselves. The lord just keeps makind the villiens working and doesn't give them a break at all.
What is a medieval villien?
A villien is a serf or peasant. Villiens were the lowest rank, not much different from being a slave, escpet they had to feed themselves. They sometimes grew crops and tithed part of it to their lord. They also had to pay to use things like a lord's oven for making bread. Their life was hard.
How villiens get to heaven?
Villains can get to heaven by seeking forgiveness for their wrongdoings, changing their ways, and showing genuine remorse for their actions. If they make amends and strive to lead a more righteous life, it is believed that they can be forgiven and find redemption. Ultimately, it is up to a higher power to judge and determine their entrance into heaven.
Did medieval villiens work all days of the week?
Everyone worked six days a week right up until the Victorian era (the "weekend" is a relatively new invention). Serfs, who "belonged" to a landlord, would have spent up to six days week working in the landlord's fields or tending his animals. Villeins, who were free men, either worked a certain number of days and/or paid rent to the landlord and could work the rest of the time in their own fields. Working on a Sunday in the Middle Ages was actually illegal, though dispensations were granted to some professions and during the harvest period. It should also be remembered that several religious holidays were also obligatory rest days, such as christmas, and there were far more celebrated in the mediaeval period than are today, although the exact dates observed varied sometimes from village to village. In fact, the word "holiday" comes from the root "holy day"!
What is the difference between a villein and a freeman from the medieval times?
There are lots of differences between Freemen Villeins such as villeins had to stay on the lord's land all of their life and didn't get paid. On the other hand freemen got paid, and could own a small bit of the lord's land if they paid for it. Another difference is that Freemen were allowed to live where they wanted to. The villeins had to get permission for everything, from using the town oven to who they were allowed to marry. Were as Freemen were allowed to do things with out the lord's permission.
How were serfs and slaves alike and different?
A serf is not owned by anyone, although the word serf is based upon the Latin "servus", meaning slave. It is the land that is owned, and the serfs live on the land, work the land and contribute so much of their output to the coffers of the owner/lord. Initially many serfs were free to leave the land they worked on, although wherever they went (save cities), they would essentially move to someone else's land and contribute to that lord's coffers. This became troublesome during periods of migration to cities, and so serfs became "tied" to the land. This was beneficial to lords who could call on serfs to stand in as pikemen or archers in their lord's army. However they were not able to leave the land they lived and worked on. Many serfs were born and died on the same plot of land.A slave is personal property. And as such, the owner of the slave has paid for an investment and expects the investment to grow. Slaves were mistreated in many cases but treated well in many more. In the US in the late 18th and 19th centuries, a slave was a valuable commodity and thus only the wealthy plantation owners had more than a couple slaves. Poor sharecroppers could not afford a slave, and those that did well enough to purchase a couple slaves could ill afford for them to die or be unable to work because of mistreatment.Serfs, not being personal property, were often seen as expendable by absentee lords who owned vast tracts of land across many countries. The condition of serfdom was technically as such that the serf agreed to work the lands he or she lived on and would abide by the will of his/her lord, and in return, the lord would protect the serf from outside invasion, marauders, barbarians, etc.Like slavery, serfdom was heriditary. Those who bond themselves to serfdom bond their families and future sons and daughters into perpetuity.Certain types of serfs, such as villiens, owned their own land but as a price for this were expected to till the lord's land for so many hours of the day/week. Cottagers were allowed their own homes but did not own any land and were expected to work the lord's land in return for respecting the sovereignty of the house/hut and garden.Many serfs however did not even own the clothes they wore, all of this, the food they ate, the house they lived in, the land they worked, the clothes, animals kept.. everything except their naked selves, were the property of the lord. They were expected to work first for their lords crops and fields, then tend to their own harvest for themselves and their family. Most lords worth any respectability were expected to provide a meal to their serfs.In some ways it was worse to be a serf than a slave. A serf tilled his lord's fields and if their was any time left, he had to till his own. A slave only tilled the master's fields and from these fields a certain allotment went to the slave. Also, a percentage of plantation slaves could attain prestigious in-house positions as nannies, house servants and such. Many serfs, tied to the land as they were, could not expect any other employ than full time crop harvesting, timber felling, fishing his lords streams, mining his lord's mines and hunting game for his lord. However, a serf still carried a level of dignity not afforded to the slave in the Western Hemisphere. He could attend the same church as a lord and would attend the same religious ceremonies and festivities as better classes. He probably worked harder, but was more dignified.
What is the difference between a Slave and a Serf?
A slave is owned by another person as property and has no freedom or rights. A serf, on the other hand, is tied to the land they work on and must provide labor or goods to the landowner in exchange for protection and the right to live on the land. Serfs have some rights and legal protections that slaves do not.
What was life like on the Arabian peninsula during the middle ages?
Depending on your rank in the feudal system , lifestyle varied for each class. At the bottom we had the Peasants or "serfs"/"Villiens" . Peasant's worked crops , animals and crafts . Life was difficult , work started at 3am in the morning. Next we have knights who devoted themselves to protect the king , fiefs , lords etc. Vassals did service to the king in exchange for hommage . Lords and nobles were ranked under the king. Their was to protect the king( so i've heard)
