Before 490 BC the patrician aristocracy monopolised political power and exploited and abused the plebeians (the commoners. In 495 BC, this situation lead to plebeian disaffection and there was the beginning of a 200-year conflict between patricians and plebeians (the Conflict of the Orders).
The patricians owned large landed estates. They secured the labour of small farmers who were struggling to make ends meet through debt bondage. This was an arrangement whereby the debtor pledged his person as collateral should he default on his loan. The debtor then had to work for the creditor. This often led to the abuse of defaulting debtors, who were often imprisoned and tortured and sometimes sold as slaves.
In 495 BC the plebeians held protests against the abuse of defaulting debtor and demanded that the Roman state address this issue. Since the state refused to act, the plebeians seceded en masse. They left Rome and went to a nearby hill and said that they would stay there if their demand were not met. When a compromise was reached, they returned to Rome, but politically the secession continued. The plebeians formed a state within the state. They turned the Aventine Hill into their jurisdiction and made their decisions there independently from the Roman state through their assembly, the Plebeian Council. They were very dissatisfied with the Roman state and lost all faith in it.
they are fighting because the plebeians don't want for the patricians to take over everything. the patricians were to greedy. the patricians and the plebeians fighting over land.
The main struggle of the orders' central conflict was war.
Only patricians could become government leaders so after the patricians took over the plebeians protested against the patricians. And then after that the patricians and the plebeians worked together to make the roman government better.
The Law of the Twelve Tables of 450 BC contained a law which forbade marriages between patricians and plebeians. This caused such an uproar that it was repealed and plebeians were allowed to marry patricians again.
At the beginning of the Roman Republic the patricians monopolised political power by monopolising the consulship (the office of the two annually elected heads of the Republic), the senate and the priesthoods.
No the conflicts between patricians and plebeians did not lead to civil wars. The Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians ended in the mid-3rd century BC. The Roman civil wars stared in the 1st century BC. The civil wars involved a conflict between the populares, a political faction which supported the cause of the poor, and the optimates, a conservative political faction which supported the interests of the aristocracy. They also involved personal rivalries.
The patricians were the aristocrats and the plebeians were the commoners.
The war between the patricians and the plebeians was/is called "the Conflict of the Orders"
they are fighting because the plebeians don't want for the patricians to take over everything. the patricians were to greedy. the patricians and the plebeians fighting over land.
Plebeians had to fight in the army as Rome expanded. Many plebeians refused to join the army because the patricians had more freedom in Rome. This caused a conflict between the patricians and the plebeians.
friction between the patricians and the plebeians
The differences between the Plebeians and Patricians were the differences between the rich and the poor. So yes, these differences still exist in all countries all over the world.
friction between the patricians and the plebeians
The main struggle of the orders' central conflict was war.
The patricians were heads of aristocratic families and the plebians were the common people.
The patricians were heads of aristocratic families and the plebians were the common people.
Plebians and Patricians are similar because they were both Latin and worked with at least one type of republic;Plebeians worked with Assembly and Patricians worked with Senate