The Great Compromise of the Convention is the convection that was made to in order to solve the issue of kind of slaves for representation and taxation.
The three-fifths compromise showcased the escalating divisions between Northern and Southern states. The issue was over how slaves would be counted for taxation and legislative purposes.
The issue of representation led to the Connecticut (or great) compromise.
how to end taxation without representation.
The 3/5 Compromise settled the issue of how slave populations would be considered in determining representation in the House of Representatives. Although slaves were not citizens, and could not vote, the Southern states wanted them counted as residents for apportionment purposes.The Three-fifths Compromise gave the otherwise small white populations of the South an equal footing with the more populous North, and this compromise held until the basic issue of slavery became paramount in the 1820s and 1830s. The question of extending slavery into new states eventually led to the Civil War (1861-1865) and the end of slavery in the US.---It dealt with slavery and the issue of including them into the population of Southern states.The Three-Fifths Compromise settled the issue of how slaves would be counted in terms of congressional representation and how the state would be taxed. Since slaves weren't allowed to vote, they were counted as three-fifths of a free, voting white male.How states would count the slave population for purposes of taxation and representation
Representation in Congress :)
The three-fifths compromise showcased the escalating divisions between Northern and Southern states. The issue was over how slaves would be counted for taxation and legislative purposes.
This was not an issue presented at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 in Philadelphia. It was an issue that came about later and was resolved with the 3/5 compromise. Each slave was counted as 3/5 a person for census/taxation purposes. Good Luck!
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
representation in Congress
The issue of representation led to the Connecticut (or great) compromise.
They agreed with the south who owed slaves
how to end taxation without representation.
The 3/5 Compromise settled the issue of how slave populations would be considered in determining representation in the House of Representatives. Although slaves were not citizens, and could not vote, the Southern states wanted them counted as residents for apportionment purposes.The Three-fifths Compromise gave the otherwise small white populations of the South an equal footing with the more populous North, and this compromise held until the basic issue of slavery became paramount in the 1820s and 1830s. The question of extending slavery into new states eventually led to the Civil War (1861-1865) and the end of slavery in the US.---It dealt with slavery and the issue of including them into the population of Southern states.The Three-Fifths Compromise settled the issue of how slaves would be counted in terms of congressional representation and how the state would be taxed. Since slaves weren't allowed to vote, they were counted as three-fifths of a free, voting white male.How states would count the slave population for purposes of taxation and representation
Representation in Congress :)
Apportionment
To settle the question of how slaves were to be counted by the U.S. Census Bureau, whose constitutionally mandated work directly affects congressional representation and taxation, the Three-Fifths Compromise was adopted. Each slave was counted as three fifths of a person.