0
What court case dealt with the Cherokee's attemt to fight the Indian Removal Act?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did John Ross argue against the removal of the Cherokees?
He lobbied against the passage of the Indian Removal Act and gained the support of some prominent Whigs, but it passed. He filed suit in the Supreme Court against the state of Georgia in protest of state laws that punished the Cherokee. The Court ruled that state laws did not apply to Indian affairs but that did not help the Cherokee where federal law was concerned. He tried to get a treaty approved that would delay the removal of the Cherokee but another faction in the Cherokee nation signed a different treaty that agreed to the removal.
How did the seminole Indians react to the Indian removal act?
5
Which case supported the Cherokees?
In the year 1988 the federal court heard the case of Nero v. Cherokee Nation. This case went through many appeals and in 2006 the Cherokee nation Tribunal rules that Cherokee Freedmen were allow to apply of Cherokee citizenship.
Were Cherokee Indians bad?
Cherokee of North Georgia were farmers and wore the clothes of many Europeon immigrants. When they were going to be moved by the Indian removal at they organized as a nation and then were removed by treaty to Oklahoma. Other than reacting to property being taken under false pretensions and fighting legally, including law suits going all the way to the supreme court, the Cherokee were willing to assimilate the European culture.
What are Main functions of consumer courts?
The main function of consumer court is to ensure that every consumer has the right to seek redressal in the courts, and the court should see that the consumer is satisfied by the verdict of the judges and is provided the following reliefs :- o Removal of defects from the good. o Replacement of the goods. o Refund of the price paid. o Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered. o Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services. o Discontinuance of unfair trade practices. o Withdrawal of the hazardous goods from being offered to sale. o Award for adequate costs to parties. - Sagar Sood
What event resulted in the Cherokees marching at gunpoint from GA to OK 1838?
Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Act of 1830. In the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, Supreme court ruled in favor of cherokees. they could keep their land. Jackson didnt care and ignored the judgment of SUPREME COURT and forced the cherokees to oklahoma (trail of tears)
Why did the Cherokees have felt betrayed when the Indian removal act was passed in 1830?
The Cherokee had one the supreme court but Andrew Jackson had ignored the victory of the cherokee and still removed them from their sacred lands for his use.
How did president Jackson react to the supreme court removal on the Indian removal act?
Jackson refused to obey the court's ruling
How did John Ross argue against the removal of the Cherokees?
He lobbied against the passage of the Indian Removal Act and gained the support of some prominent Whigs, but it passed. He filed suit in the Supreme Court against the state of Georgia in protest of state laws that punished the Cherokee. The Court ruled that state laws did not apply to Indian affairs but that did not help the Cherokee where federal law was concerned. He tried to get a treaty approved that would delay the removal of the Cherokee but another faction in the Cherokee nation signed a different treaty that agreed to the removal.
What was the Indian Removal act?
The indian Removal act is when President Jackson wanted to move the Indians or Native Americans out from there land and payed the indians money and gave them aid for one year. (1830) A law that made it legal for the President (Andrew Jackson) to move Native tribes west. The Cherokees were one group that was evicted from their land in Georgia and South Carolina. A lottery was held to divide their land.The Indian removal act was when Cherokees and other tribes were living on fertile land, which also has gold. America wants the land and they try to get the southeastern tribes to sign away their land. some think it is mandatory and sign it, but some tribes, among them the Cherokee,refuse to sign away their land. the whole thing goes to supreme court and supreme court judge john Marshall says that the land is the Cherokees and shows treaties to prove it. Andrew Jackson, president at the time, did not like this ruling. he proposed a law to congress which was the Indian Removal act. congress passed the law and the Indians had 2 years to leave their lands. some left to land west of the Mississippi in present day Ohio, but this land is not fertile and nothing like the Indians homeland. the Cherokees stay for the 2 years and then they are forced to leave in the Trail of Tears. they were relocated in the winter and many didn't even have shoes. the Cherokees had nearly half the people that the had at the start.The Indian Removal Act authorized the President to give the unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange of the Indian lands.
Which American Indian tribe took battle over the Indian removal act to court?
The cherokee
How did president Jackson react to the supreme court on the Indian removal act?
Jackson refused to obey the court's ruling
Why did Andrew Jackson remove Cherokees?
Basically, yes. He passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830 to move all the Indians to lands west of the Mississippi because the white men wanted Indian territory. Most of the tribes were against moving and giving their land up; the Cherokees hired a lawyer to argue their case in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court ruled in their favor. However the state of Georgia refused to abide by the Court's decision and Jackson refused to enforce the law. The Cherokee were later tricked into signing a Removal Treaty and, although the treaty was illegitimate, they were given two years to migrate. Only 2000 moved and more than 16000 remained on their lands. At that point they were forced to move to western lands by the military
Why did treatment of Cherokee get worse after the Court declared Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?
The federal government did not enforce the Court's decisions.
The Supreme Court says Georgia Indian laws are unconstitutional. Cherokee fight for the US in the War of 1812. Jackson supports the Indian Removal Act with force.?
1. Cherokee fight for the United States in the War of 18122. The Supreme Court says Georgia Indian laws are unconstitutional3. Jackson supp0rts the Indian Removal Act with force(Apex)
Why did treatment of Cherokee get a worse after the supreme court declared Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?
The federal government
How did President Jackson respond to the Supreme Court's decision in the Indian removal act?
Jackson refused to obey the court's ruling
