0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who ultimately decides what effects such things as affirmative action have on the country?
The impact of affirmative action policies on the country is typically evaluated through a combination of legislative decisions, judicial rulings, public opinion, and empirical research. Ultimately, the effects are influenced by how these different stakeholders interpret and implement affirmative action measures in various contexts.
Issues surrounding affirmative action are ultimately decided by?
supreme court jsut a guess
What are democratic views on affirmative action?
Democratic views on affirmative action vary, but most Democrats support it as a means to promote equality and diversity. They believe that affirmative action is necessary to address historical disadvantages faced by marginalized groups, and it helps to create a more inclusive and equitable society. Democrats generally argue that affirmative action policies should be implemented to ensure equal opportunities in education, employment, and other areas.
What is the first major supreme Court case that challenged affirmative action?
University of California v. Bakke
Should Affirmative Action be eliminated?
Affirmative action, otherwise known as "reverse-discrimination", is a policy that effectively discriminates against certain groups for the benefit of other groups. The intent of such a policy is to "even the playing field." The actual result, however, is that less qualified individuals unfairly gain access to employment, education, groups, etc at the expense of more qualified individuals. But this does not even begin to address the true underpinnings of discrimination. The result of affirmative action, or discrimination, is that those in the "target" groups that affirmative action is supposed to help might obtain credentials that are then questioned (fairly or unfairly) but others who wonder if their success was a product of talent and hard-work or of government-sponsorsored discrimination - ie affirmative action. So, the result is that affirmative action actually LEADS to stereotyping, the underpinning of discrimination. Affirmative Action should absolutely be eliminated. Fairness is not unilateral - the only way to address problems of discrimination is by even-ing the playing field for all. Education and free markets are the solution.
What court case encouraged companies to create affirmative action programs?
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
Recent Supreme Court rulings have indicated that affirmative action programs in schools are what?
Should treat everyone equally.
Recent Supreme Court rulings have indicated that affirmative action programs in schools .?
Recent Supreme Court rulings have upheld the use of affirmative action programs in schools but have also imposed limitations on their implementation, such as emphasizing that race cannot be the decisive factor in admissions decisions. The rulings aim to strike a balance between promoting diversity and ensuring that the programs are narrowly tailored and do not result in quotas or discrimination against other groups.
What was the US Supreme Court case that declared affirmative action racial quotas unconstitutional?
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
How do you affirmative as a sentence?
Are you sure captain? "affirmative" , said the captain.
What supreme court ruling said that affirmative action programs must show some compelling governmental issues?
Adarand Constructors v. Pena
Define affirmative action and two Supreme Court cases that have ruled on it Evaluate the effectiveness of affirmative action programs and evaluate whether the need for these programs remains today?
Two USSC cases which dealt with affirmative action cases were Grutter v. Bollinger and Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. It was in these two cases that the Court dealt with the issue of affirmative action in university admissions. Both cases resulted in a very divided Court; even with 25 years between the two decisions. The effectiveness of affirmative action, if correctly addressed, had a place in the job force as well as education admissions. As the Court explained any affirmative action program that is "narrowly tailored", temporary and flexible did not place undue burdens on racial groups as a whole. States and schools have a compelling interest to ensure past racial considerations and minority diversity are prevalent in the process of hiring and educating. As far as the current and future needs of affirmative action I believe that, especially with the influx of diversity in our population, the need for programs has changed. We are not the country we were 50 years ago and continue to "blend" amongst ourselves in a way that creates no definite or absolute racial groups. During the last census, for example, almost half of the people in the United States when asked to check the appropriate box for their race marked more than one answer. Although racism is still prevalent in our country today with the current demographic trends we will surely see a downturn in the use of affirmative action programs in the future.
