They passed a law in 1807 that prohibited imporation of slaves to the United States. The law took effect on January 1, 1808. The law did not ban slavery and children born to slaves automatically became slaves themselves. This law and the increasing need for slaves in the South caused the domestic slave trade to increase.
The invention of the Cotton Gin, and the widespread popularity of cotton garments and products led to an increase in the domestic slave trade. International slave trading had been banned, however, the buying and selling of slaves within the United States increased to meet the demand for labor on large cotton plantations.
It would upset the balance between the slave and free states in the Senate. By Paul A Rivera
Employs slave laborers
The international slave trade ended APEX
Were ignored and flaunted.
the slave trade
there was suddenly more land available
It would increase slave territory, thus weakening their position in the US Congress.
Congress could pass laws about the slave market prior to the abolition of slavery in the United States. The slave trade was banned in the United States in 1808, and Congress could have passed laws regulating or outlawing the domestic slave trade before that date. However, the enactment of such laws would have been unlikely given the economic and political interests associated with slavery at the time.
Possibly the dependency of slave labor for cotton production that was in high demand. It was cheep and demand was high.
Slave families were split up and sold as part of the domestic slave trade.
The increased use of African slave labor.
Fewer indentured servants arrived as conditions in Europe improved.
Slave families were split up.
The invention of the Cotton Gin, and the widespread popularity of cotton garments and products led to an increase in the domestic slave trade. International slave trading had been banned, however, the buying and selling of slaves within the United States increased to meet the demand for labor on large cotton plantations.
Slave sellers and slave buyers.
It would upset the balance between the slave and free states in the Senate. By Paul A Rivera