Want this question answered?
Calvin Say was born on 1952-02-01.
Probably Wycliffe, Hus or Calvin. In terms of long term impact I would probably say Calvin
This being a subjective concept I would say natural moral law :)
This being a subjective concept I would say natural moral law :)
John Calvin is the father of Calvinism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Calvin) However most of his ideas are built on the beliefs of St. Augustine, some say that Augustine is the father of reformed theology (calvinism)
Primarily Martin Luther, although some experts say that it was John Calvin.
John Lockewas the first to say that people have natural rights of life liberty and property.
Natural law is described as a fundamental principal, right or justice which human reasonm can discern merely by attending carefully to the proposition stating that principal. Some philosophers say that natural law is, or should be, the ultimate source of the authority for the actual laws under which we live.
Catholic dogma is that everybody is loved by God, and was created by Him to be happy with Him forever in heaven. John Calvin preached double predestination, a doctrine which specifically says that God created some people with the sole end of going to hell, a despicable, anti-Christian doctrine that would imagine our Loving Father creating people to be eternally damned from the moment they were brought into existence. No, I would not say that John Calvin's doctrines were particularly cheerful, I would say that they were diabolical.
Legislation imposed by human authority, implementing the natural law. It may take one of two forms, declarative or specifying. Declarative positive laws simply declare in so many words what the natural law prescribes or draw conclusions deducible from the natural law. Such are laws forbidding murder, theft, or perjury. They differ from natural law only in the manner of promulgation, say the State, and not only by the natural light of reason. Specifying positive laws determine or establish specific ways of acting in accordance with the natural law but not directly concluding from it. Such are traffic laws, ways of collecting taxes, and the conditions for just contracts. No human law that contradicts the natural law is a true law, but it need not merely re-echo the natural law. ~Seem below link:
Legislation imposed by human authority, implementing the natural law. It may take one of two forms, declarative or specifying. Declarative positive laws simply declare in so many words what the natural law prescribes or draw conclusions deducible from the natural law. Such are laws forbidding murder, theft, or perjury. They differ from natural law only in the manner of promulgation, say the State, and not only by the natural light of reason. Specifying positive laws determine or establish specific ways of acting in accordance with the natural law but not directly concluding from it. Such are traffic laws, ways of collecting taxes, and the conditions for just contracts. No human law that contradicts the natural law is a true law, but it need not merely re-echo the natural law. ~Seem below link:
Calvin Coolge is our 30th president of the USA. He didnt say much, but that's what he was known for.