it is jiijihihjijhihji
it is jiijihihjijhihji
Akkadian Empire under Sargon united Mesopotamia under his singular rule. His Empire was preceded by the Sumerian civilization of city-states that had existed prior to, during, and after his rule from the early 3rd millennium BCE
g
Sarong did not become an empire. He could not possibly have done so because he was a man. Actually there were three Sargons; Sargon or Akkad or Sarong the great (ruled c. 2334 BC - 2279 BC) was the founder of the Akkadian Empire and the Dynasty of Akkad Sargon I (ruled 1920-1881 BC) was the fifth king of the Old Assyrian Empire Sargon II (ruled 722-705 BC) was the eleventh king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire
The sumerians believed that the gods ruled the cities
The answer is it had a professional army. hope this was helpful! 😁👍
it is jiijihihjijhihji
they all were cities and this is not the rite answer aka
When Sargon defeated its previous ruler, Mesopotamia is composed of city-states that revolted against him. Sargon's creation of an empire started with the conquest of each city state, and led to the building of the city of Babylon.
There was a weakening of the Mesopotamian and Egyptian states that corresponded with an increasing federalization of the Israelite Tribal confederacy.
Akkadian Empire under Sargon united Mesopotamia under his singular rule. His Empire was preceded by the Sumerian civilization of city-states that had existed prior to, during, and after his rule from the early 3rd millennium BCE
What states where in the dust bowl
weak empire Mesopotamia had a weak empireReality:The fact that city-states are mentioned makes it plain that there was no empire - city-states are what they say - independent states based on a city, and so could not be an 'empire' which connotes centralised rule. And it was this independent status which led them to fighting between themselves. Mesopotamian civilisation was dependent on land and water. Disputed over them drove wars of possession.
Yes, the noun 'empires' is a common noun, the plural form of the noun 'empire', a general word for any group of states or countries under a single supreme authority.
g
weak empire Mesopotamia had a weak empireReality:The fact that city-states are mentioned makes it plain that there was no empire - city-states are what they say - independent states based on a city, and so could not be an 'empire' which connotes centralised rule. And it was this independent status which led them to fighting between themselves. Mesopotamian civilisation was dependent on land and water. Disputed over them drove wars of possession.
weak empire Mesopotamia had a weak empireReality:The fact that city-states are mentioned makes it plain that there was no empire - city-states are what they say - independent states based on a city, and so could not be an 'empire' which connotes centralised rule. And it was this independent status which led them to fighting between themselves. Mesopotamian civilisation was dependent on land and water. Disputed over them drove wars of possession.