The Missouri Compromise provided that no Slave State could be established to the north of a line represented by the parallel 36° 30' coincident with the Southern boundary of Missouri.
what did the northern give up in the Missouri Compromise
Missouri was allowed to join the USA as a slave-state. Other territories within the Louisiana Purchase, south of Latitude 36.30, could also join as slave-states.
The Missouri Compromise was not a cause of the war - it was a reasonable deal that delayed hostilities for forty years. The Compromise of 1850 included a provision to toughen-up the Fugitive Slave Act, and this became an emotive issue in the North, especially when Uncle Tom's Cabin was published soon after.
The North had less use for slaves than the South did, and many Northern people helped slaves gain freedom.
None. It never managed to gain control of South Korea.
The north had all the industry (south was mainly agricultural), and also managed to gain the moral high ground over the slavery issue (hence why Europe cut off support for the south).
An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.
The assurance that there would be no new slave-states North of the Missouri line.
Missouri was allowed to join the USA as a slave-state. Other territories within the Louisiana Purchase, south of Latitude 36.30, could also join as slave-states.
The Missouri Compromise, which said that slavery was to be banned anywhere north of the 36th parallel, with the exception of Missouri.
It entered the Union as a result of the Missouri Compromise.
They gained Missouri as a slave holding state as well as the land below the 36°30' parallel known as the Arkansas Territory. They lost the chance to admit more slave holding states besides what they owned in the small territory due to the Missouri Compromise Line.
problems were solved
The Missouri Compromise was not a cause of the war - it was a reasonable deal that delayed hostilities for forty years. The Compromise of 1850 included a provision to toughen-up the Fugitive Slave Act, and this became an emotive issue in the North, especially when Uncle Tom's Cabin was published soon after.
Scott didn't win his freedom and the decision reinforced the idea that slaves were property. The Missouri Compromise was a blow to the southern states to gain more slave states. I don't think the Scott decision added anything to the compromise, but it did entrench slavery in the states where it existed.
They gained all states above the imaginary line, i dont remember where it was set
The admission of California as free soil, and the abolition of the slave-trade in DC.
The north would then gain more power over the south.