0
What did the Soviet Union's development of the atomic bomb in 1949 start?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why didnt US support the hungarians in their 1956 revolt because?
The United States was afraid to start a war with the Soviet Union
How do you find money to start a business?
Places To Find Money To Start A Business: Friends and family Banks and credit unions Economic development programs Corporate programs Crowdfunding and crowdlending sites. Rollovers As Business Startups (ROBS) Home equity loans
How did the labor unions start?
started by terry collingwood in 1956
What year did the cold war start between the US and the USSR?
Most people suggest that the Cold War began in 1949 when the Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb.
When did the nuclear arms race start?
The nuclear arms race began after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan in August of 1945. This would effectively begin the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union.
What are the major historical events in Kazakhstan?
the fall of the soviet union the birth of the country world war 2 the start of demorcry the start of the soviet union
Can not start messenger?
In soviet russia messenger starts you
How did dropping the atomic bomb change the atomic age?
Well, it was usually considered the official start.
Why do people cry when they chop unions?
because of the odor and fumes coming of of it when you start to cut into it.
What year did labor unions start?
Miriam-Webster Dictionary cites the year 1866 for the noun: Labor Union
What did rerf do to help japan after the atomic bombs?
Almost immediately following the end of World War II, Americans began to question the use of the atomic bomb and the circumstances surrounding the end of the Pacific War. More than half a century later, books and articles on the atomic bomb still provoke storms of debate among readers and the use of atomic weapons remains a sharply contested subject. As the 1995 controversy over the Enola Gay exhibit at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum revealed, the issues connected with the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki continue to touch a sensitive nerve in Americans. Among scholars, disagreement remains no less heated. But, on the whole, this debate has been strangely parochial, centering almost exclusively on how the U.S. leadership made the decision to drop the bombs. There are two distinct gaps in this historiography. First, with regard to the atomic bombs, as Asada Sadao in Japan correctly observes, American historians have concentrated on the "motives" behind the use of atomic bombs, but "they have slighted the effects of the bomb." Second, although historians have been aware of the decisive influence of both the atomic bombs and the Soviet entry into the war, they have largely sidestepped the Soviet factor, relegating it to sideshow status. A series of counterfactual hypotheses can help clarify the question of which factor, the atomic bombs or Soviet entry into the war, had the more decisive effect on Japan's decision to surrender. We might ask, in particular, whether Japan would have surrendered before November 1, the scheduled date for the start of Operation Olympic, the U.S. invasion of Kyushu, given neither the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki nor Soviet entry into the war; Soviet entry alone, without the atomic bombings; or the atomic bombings alone, without Soviet entry.
Did the Soviet Union start in 1957?
No... they did not start in 1957, otherwise they never would have fought in WW2
