0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does the case of Munn v Illinois gave states the right to regulate?
Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113 (1877)The US Supreme Court defined certain private businesses as "private utilities" operating in the public interest, and gave the States the right to regulate the prices they charged their customers. Munn specifically addressed the use of grain elevators, but the Court's decision applied the regulatory rights across a broad spectrum of industries, including railroads, that operated intrastate.
What is the Rule of Four in the US Supreme Court?
The Rule of Four means four of the nine justices must agree to hear a case in order for it to be accepted on appeal. If four or more justices think the case is worth the Court's time, then the Supreme Court will issue a writ of certiorari to the lower court ordering them to send the case files to the Supreme Court, and the case will be placed on the docket.
What was the significance of Fletcher v Peck US Supreme Court case?
The case was important because it was the first time the US Supreme Court found a state law unconstitutional. This case was in 1810.
What if a state declares a law unconstitutional and void?
If a state court declares a state law unconstitutional, the state will probably appeal the case to the state supreme court. If a state court declares a federal law unconstitutional, the losing party in the case will appeal the decision in the federal courts. The case could ultimately be heard by the US Supreme Court; however, if a lower court reverses the state court's decision and either the appropriate US Court of Appeals Circuit Court or US Supreme Court decline to consider the case, the decision of the lower federal court would be final. The US Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of constitutionality.
What precedent did Marbury v. Madison set?
In 1803, Marshall decided a case that increased the power of the supreme court.
The Supreme Court case of munn vs Illinois showed what?
Supreme Court case of Munn v Illinois showed that states need to regulate certain businesses
The supreme court case of munn v . Illinois showed that?
Farmers had political power
The supreme court case of munn v Illinois decided that?
the granger laws were legal
What did the supreme court case of Munn v Illinois decided on?
The Granger laws were legal.
What did the supreme court case of Munn vs. Illinois decide?
it allowed the government to set prices over some private businesses
What groups were involved in this case the landmark Supreme Court decision Munn v Illinois?
no the chinese are secretly using them as bombs to destroy the united states
What did the supreme court case of Munn v. Illinois give states the right to regulate?
government to set prices over some private businesses.
What did the supreme court case of Munn v. Illinois decide?
The Granger laws were legal -Apex
What was the supreme court case that overturned the munn V. Illinois?
The Supreme Court case that overturned Munn v. Illinois was Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Illinois (1886). In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not regulate rates for interstate railroad traffic because it violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. This decision limited the ability of states to regulate certain aspects of interstate commerce.
What did The Supreme Court case of Munn v Illinois show?
Farmers had political power. APEX the granger laws were legal
What was the US Supreme Court case Munn v. Illinois about?
Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113 (1877)The question that the case was concerned with was whether a state could regulate charges for grain elevators. This is expanded - using the idea that a state has the right to regulate commerce within that state - to the fact that if a private utility is used in the public good, it should be regulated by the state, as the state is acting on behalf of the people's interest.Granger laws were legal...Apex...:)
What is the importance of the Munn vs Illinois case?
Absolutely nothing.
