they went out to smell roses and dance on unicorns
Its not resolved yet. Peace making soldiers are them. Many returned from exile and trying to start a new life in Darfur. Still its fragile.
No it didnt in a full meaning
The similarities between the Rwandan genocide and Darfur are that rebel's attack government and the government's reply is to purposely kill not only the rebels but the civilians. The World hasn't and didn't do anything really to stop it. Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, and many more removed from their homes. Both acts were some what supported by the government.
It really did not have a huge affect on the world. The UN came to help but that was it. Their were the UNAMIR efforts to help. The genocide in Rwanda was left in Rwanda and neither the U.S or Europe clamed to help.
south and north
Rebels to arms for Independance of Darfur. The Janwaweed Militia, supported by the Sudanese Govt. wanted to eliminate the issue of self-proclamation of Darfur. They just wanted to wipe the Darfur people, so that none remains alive to ask for liberty.
no it has not
The UN did not recognise <the Darfur case> as genocide, although UN sent peace keepers. General public, press, writers, human right organisations remembers the Darfur case as Massacre. Many consder its as e Genocide.
rwanada had the UN involved more people died and lasted 100 days
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
It sent humanitarian aid for people driven from their homes.
That human rights had been violated, but that the conflict was not genocide
Answer this question… It sent humanitarian aid for people driven from their homes
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
Answer this question… the government's intention was to stop rebels, not to eliminate an ethnic group
Acc to UN, Basic world media, there is no established GENOCIDE in Tibet (at least with number of deaths). No comparison with Rwanda, Armenia, Bangladesh or even Darfur. Yes, displacement and forced migration is there, including Dalai Lama fled to India.
It depends on the genocide. There are some genocides, like the East Timor Genocide, that the UN did help to stop. There are some genocides, like the Rwanda Genocide, that the UN ignored. There are some genocides like the Holocaust, which occurred prior to the UN's existence.