Many historians cite the conquer of Britain as the most important accomplishment of the ancient emperor known as Claudius. The process began in AD 43.
Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.
According to most ancient historians Claudius was poisoned. However, different accounts tell different stories. According to some he died after prolonged suffering, while others say that he recovered and was poisoned again. Josephus described the murder accounts as rumours. Seneca the Younger said that he died of natural causes. The murder accounts point their fingers to his scheming wife, Agrippina the Younger. Some modern historians doubt the murder theories and think that they were door to ancient historians being susceptible to rumours and gossip.
Nothing was said by ancient historians about whether Claudius was popular with the people. His closest advisor burnt all Claudius' letters before he was murdered. Suetonius and Tacitus portrayed him as a weak fool controlled his inner circle he supposedly ruled. Both writers were sympathetic to the senators, who had been in conflict with Claudius, and thus biased. Suetonius, lost access to the archives and relied on second hand information. Cassius Dio, who relied on the two mentioned historians as his sources, painted the same picture. Not much was said about his rule and his personality.
The two most impartant ancient historians who wrote about the Second Punic War were Polybius (a Greek) and Livy (a Roman).
Historians study cultural hearths to make connections between ancient civilizations.
Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.Claudius ruled ancient Rome in 44 AD. He ruled from 41 to 54.
It is important to historians, as it has left alot of artefacts and alot of ancient ruins, which give out lots of facts, and clues, on how the romans lived.
According to most ancient historians Claudius was poisoned. However, different accounts tell different stories. According to some he died after prolonged suffering, while others say that he recovered and was poisoned again. Josephus described the murder accounts as rumours. Seneca the Younger said that he died of natural causes. The murder accounts point their fingers to his scheming wife, Agrippina the Younger. Some modern historians doubt the murder theories and think that they were door to ancient historians being susceptible to rumours and gossip.
Nothing was said by ancient historians about whether Claudius was popular with the people. His closest advisor burnt all Claudius' letters before he was murdered. Suetonius and Tacitus portrayed him as a weak fool controlled his inner circle he supposedly ruled. Both writers were sympathetic to the senators, who had been in conflict with Claudius, and thus biased. Suetonius, lost access to the archives and relied on second hand information. Cassius Dio, who relied on the two mentioned historians as his sources, painted the same picture. Not much was said about his rule and his personality.
Arnaldo Momigliano has written: 'Claudius' 'Essays in ancient and modern historiography' -- subject(s): Historiography, Ancient History 'Claudius, the Emperor and his achievement'
in 10 BC in ancient rome
It is a major accomplishment of ancient engineering, an important piece of cultural history, and is quite an interesting sculpture/structure in its own right.
Griots
Historians do not feel that there is nothing left from ancient Sparta.
They get the information from the writings of ancient Roman historians.
The two most impartant ancient historians who wrote about the Second Punic War were Polybius (a Greek) and Livy (a Roman).
Many modern day historians cite the following ancient historians as the most informative and accurate:1. Tacitus; 2. Herodotus; 3. Polybius; and 4. Thucydides.