0
What do those scientists who do not believe in the earth is experiencing global warming use as evidence to support their claims?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Do Jewish scientists believe in genesis or the big bang theory?
Almost all Jewish scientists, like almost all Gentile scientists, accept the Big Bang as the correct description of our Universe. The only people who accept Genesis are Biblical literalists, and they do so in spite of scientific evidence. There is no serious evidence whatsoever to support a Universe that has existed for only a few thousand years. That being an irrefutable fact, I seriously doubt there are many Jewish scientists that are Biblical literalists.
Why do scientists think the earth is the only planet to support human life as you know it?
Not all scientists believe this. The topic of Earth being the only planet in the known universe to support life has been and still is a heated debate amongst many scientists.
What are three kinds of evidence scientists have discovered to support the idea of the ocean floor spreading?
molten material, magnetic stripes, and the ages of the rock.
Astronomers use various tools to gather evidence in support of the Big Bang Theory What are two tools used?
Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
How did seafloor drilling help scientists find the evidence to support the seafloor spreading hypothesis?
people here are stupid , really the answer is not hi
What do those scientists who believe the earth is experiencing global warming use as evidence to support their claims?
They plotted a graph that correlated the increase in CO2 to the rise in average temperature of the earth and assumed since they were similar it must be fact.
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
How did Lavoisier's evidence support other scientists?
i dont now
What evidence do scientists have to support the relationships of the earths parts?
a. seismic waves b. volcanoes c. earthquakes d. rocks
What evidence do scientists have to support the idea that the continents were once one large land mass?
the evidence is istoy lng.......
How long was it before new evidence emerged to support wegener's original theory?
In the 1960's scientists uncovered new evidence that seemed to support Wegener's theory.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
Fossils.
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?
modify the theory or discard it altogether.
What evidence support spontaneous generation?
There was no evidence and still is none. Louis Pasteur along with countless other scientists have disproved the theory of spontaneous generation.
How has religion changed over time because of science?
Many religions have been changed overtime by scientific facts either supporting them or proving them wrong. For example, many scientists believe and support the hypothesis of evolution. Proven evidence may change the way someone looks on their own religion. If scientists found the holy grail and all other sorts of artifacts people would believe in Christianity more because of the evidence supporting it.
Do Jewish scientists believe in genesis or the big bang theory?
Almost all Jewish scientists, like almost all Gentile scientists, accept the Big Bang as the correct description of our Universe. The only people who accept Genesis are Biblical literalists, and they do so in spite of scientific evidence. There is no serious evidence whatsoever to support a Universe that has existed for only a few thousand years. That being an irrefutable fact, I seriously doubt there are many Jewish scientists that are Biblical literalists.
