0
What do you call a federalist that is against the ratification of the US Constitution?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Federalists were for the ratification of the Constitution. Those who opposed such ratification were called Anti-Federalists or Confederalists.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the role of the Federalist Papers in the US Constitution?
The Federalist Papers were a series of articles written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, under the name "Publius," and published in newspapers between 1787 and 1788, to convince New York citizens to adopt the newly proposed Constitution of the United States. The essays may have played a minor role in securing ratification in NY, but they have a lasting value as the authoritative explanation of the Constitution and the form of government established in the United States. Though written for political purposes, they were later published under the title, The Federalist, and became one of the most important pieces of American political philosophy.
What did the federalist call the war of 1812?
What did federalist call the war of 1812
How did James Madison become father of the United States?
We actually call him Father of the Constitution, and that's because he was the main drafter of the Virginia Plan (and a lot of its resolves were adopted into our Constitution), greatly influenced the shape of the Constitution at the Convention, wrote 1/3 of the Federalist Papers, wrote the Bill of Rights, and served as an authority on it.
What argument did federalists have about the Bill of Rights?
There are a couple of important perspectives when discussing the Bill of Rights in reference to the Federalists (Washington/Hamilton/Jay/Madison, et al.) and the anti-Federalists (George Mason, Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, George Clinton, et al.). Thomas Jefferson was in Paris the whole time the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights were considered, though he ended up leading the anti-Federalist party within a couple of years of his return to the States.Back in 1776 when the states declared independence, they each set up a state constitution and most included a bill of rights. The anti-Federalists were anti-U.S. Constitution because they believed in strong state's rights and a weak central government...therefore the Articles of Confederation were sufficient to their ends. In part, the lack of a Bill of Rights was a reason to delay ratification of the U.S. Constitution. They were trying to call for a second Constitutional Convention before any ratification could proceed.The Federalists had their hands full in trying to get the U.S. Constitution ratified, so they felt the Constitution should be ratified and then amend it with a bill of rights. The two big states leaders in Virginia and New York were determined to defeat the Constitution. Another Federalist position was: All rights not defined in the Constitution then remain with the states and the people. They were concerned that if you start naming these rights, then it worked in reverse - that you would only have the rights that were listed...it was solved when Amendment #9 was added: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Also, Amendment #10 was included: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.This addressed the concerns of the Federalists and the anti-Federalists. It was adopted by the U.S. Congress in 1789 and sent to the states for ratification which was ratified by the states in 1791.
What did Alexander hamilton believe to be an essential safeguard and James Madison call one of the auxiliary precautions in the federalist number 78 and 51 respectively?
"judicial review" Judicial review is the power of courts to determine whether what government does is in accord with what the Constitution provides.
How did the federalist try to build support for the constitution?
The Federalists wrote a series of editorials and had them published in newspapers across the country, and as pamphlets, which argued for the ratification of the Constitution. Historians now call these The Federalist Papers.
What was the role of the Federalist Papers in the US Constitution?
The Federalist Papers were a series of articles written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, under the name "Publius," and published in newspapers between 1787 and 1788, to convince New York citizens to adopt the newly proposed Constitution of the United States. The essays may have played a minor role in securing ratification in NY, but they have a lasting value as the authoritative explanation of the Constitution and the form of government established in the United States. Though written for political purposes, they were later published under the title, The Federalist, and became one of the most important pieces of American political philosophy.
What did the federalist call the war of 1812?
What did federalist call the war of 1812
What was called A series of essays written by Hamilton Madison and Jay in support of the Constitution?
The Federalist Papers. The famous work that these men wrote was called the federalist papers. These papers were created in order to gain support for the proposed constitution. The Federalist Papers consisted of a series of articles written under the pen name of Publius which was actually Hamilton, Madison, and Jay. Some would call it the most significant public-relations campaign in history.
What type of government is created by the constitution?
The constitution set up a constitutional republic. Which also included democratic and many federalist tendencies. You could call it a presidential federal constitutional republican democracy. Maybe not in that order.
Why do they call Washington the first president?
Washington was the first president elected under the new Constitution whose ratification created the new nation of the United States of America in1787.
What do you call someone that doesn't follow the constitution?
This would be an anarchist. There are many contries that do not respect the values of the Constitution of the U.S. that would also be considered against the constitution. For example communism, monarchies etc...
Why was the bill of rights added to the constitution soon after its ratification?
During the Constitutional Convention George Mason urged the other delegates to include a Bill of Rights guaranteeing everyone their basic natural rights. The delegates chose to ignore him. Now, after the Constitution was sent out for ratification it came to their attention that many of those who opposed the Constitution did so on the basis of there was no Bill of Rights. The opponents argued that this new Constitution did not guarantee them any rights and would lead tyranny. You could call it an attempt to cover their mistake and convince people that they were the good guys.
Who supported the Bill of Rights in the constitution?
The federalists. In the Call to Freedom text book for social studies, it says a federalists is "People who support the Constitution." This means that they would also support the Bill of Rights considering the Bill of Rights is in the Constitution.
What argument in the opposed to the constitution by the anti federalist?
The term anti-federalist refers to someone of the political opinion that government authority should not extend past certain limits. In other words, they were for "small government" and more independence for individual, local political entities.
How did James Madison become father of the United States?
We actually call him Father of the Constitution, and that's because he was the main drafter of the Virginia Plan (and a lot of its resolves were adopted into our Constitution), greatly influenced the shape of the Constitution at the Convention, wrote 1/3 of the Federalist Papers, wrote the Bill of Rights, and served as an authority on it.
How is James Madison brave?
He wasn't brave as we use the word today. He was intelligent, stubborn, a founding father of the constitution, a president, a lawyer. He never did anything brave. Didn't fight in the revolution. The word brave is overused today. A brave person does something extraordinary like saving a life or going into the Twin Towers. To call others "brave" for some small acts takes the honor from people who are actually brave.
