The Attorney General of the US is a member of the President's Cabinet and is the Director of the Justice Department. The requirements for this position are not deliniated in the Constitution. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney_General
"Attorneys general" is the correct term because "attorney" is being used as an adjective to describe the type of general, just like "doctors' office" refers to an office for doctors. So, the possessive form properly applies to "attorneys."
NO !
You are thinking of Martha Mitchell, second wife of Attorney General John Mitchell,
The plural of District Attorney is "District Attorneys." For example, New York City has several District Attorneys, one for each borough. If all of New York City's District Attorneys met with the Mayor to discuss crime, you would say "All of New York City's District Attorneys met with the Mayor to discuss crime. Conversely, the plural for Attorney General is "Attorneys General." It isn't "Attorney Generals." If all of the past living Attorneys General met with the President to discuss crime, you would say "All of the past living Attorneys General met with the President to discuss crime. See the related link below for listings of District Attorneys throughout the New York State.
procuratore
As Cm punk
Do not oppose means to not to talk when he is stating his arguments unless the attorney is harassing the client of another attorney. Thou that is not a good for close.
You have the right to remain silent; anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?
Since you didn't say what oath I will answer the question in a general way. Most oaths ask a person to follow the law and have them,promise to uphold the constitution.
Since you didn't say what oath I will answer the question in a general way. Most oaths ask a person to follow the law and have them,promise to uphold the constitution.
a) Why do we say that the requirements model represents a snapshot of a system in time?
No, the constitution does not say "world 4 world" at any place in the text.