inherently unqual only means that all are created equal and then if you violate it u have violated the equal protection clause
graacis
you life saver
Brown vs Board
Brown V. Board of Education
It overturned the idea of "separate but equal" that an earlier court had established in Plessy v Ferguson, and judged unanimously that the government allowing segregation by race was *inherently* unequal.
It declared racial segregation of children in public schools unconstitutional, because "Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal." The Supreme Court decision nullified segregation policies in school districts across the country, and overturned a previous ruling made by the Supreme Court, in Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), which allowed "separate but equal" facilities.Chief Justice Warren wrote: "Separate but equal is inherently unequal."Case Citation:Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The question raised in the Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court cases was that of racial segregation. Is it okay, and if so, how should it be done? In Plessy (the earlier case), it was determined that segregation was okay as long as the facilities and education were equal. In Brown (the later case), it was decided that legalized segregation is *inherently* unequal, and it was forbidden.
The question raised in the Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court cases was that of racial segregation. Is it okay, and if so, how should it be done? In Plessy (the earlier case), it was determined that segregation was okay as long as the facilities and education were equal. In Brown (the later case), it was decided that legalized segregation is *inherently* unequal, and it was forbidden.
Appeal the decision of the court.
The question raised in the Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court cases was that of racial segregation. Is it okay, and if so, how should it be done? In Plessy (the earlier case), it was determined that segregation was okay as long as the facilities and education were equal. In Brown (the later case), it was decided that legalized segregation is *inherently* unequal, and it was forbidden.
appeal (novanet)
The Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was that racially segregated public schools were unconstitutional. The Court ruled that "separate but equal" education was inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision paved the way for desegregation in public schools and served as a landmark ruling in the civil rights movement.
Plessy v. Ferguson said that it was okay for public facilities to be separate for different races, as long as they were equal. This decision set the stage for further racial segregation. It was eventually overturned in Brown v. Board of Education. That decision noted that separate is inherently unequal.
In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court held racial segregation in the pubic schools is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause and overturned the "separate but equal" doctrine endorsed in an earlier decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896).Case Citation:Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)