answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

You're either cooperating with the court or interfering with it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

This quote means that individuals must either fully support the court's decisions and actions or be regarded as opposition. There is no middle ground or neutrality; one must take a clear stance for or against the court. The quote emphasizes the necessity of choosing sides in times of conflict or decision-making.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What does this quote mean a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it there be no road between?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

Is a judgment against the person or property?

A judgment can be against either the person or their property. A personal judgment is against the individual's assets or income, while a lien on property is against the person's property.


Under the three fifths compromise each enslaved person was counted as three fifths of a free person fow what purpose?

The three-fifths compromise counted each enslaved person as three-fifths of a free person for the purpose of determining the population of a state for representation in the House of Representatives and for calculating taxes. It gave Southern states more political power in Congress, as their slave population was counted towards representation, despite slaves being denied citizenship and voting rights.


What is the legal term for a person who initiates a lawsuit against another person for neglectful actions or wrong doing?

The legal term for a person who initiates a lawsuit against another person for neglectful actions or wrongdoing is a plaintiff.


What is the difference between the plaintiff and the defendant?

The plaintiff is the party who brings a case against another in court, seeking a legal remedy. The defendant is the party who is being sued or accused of wrongdoing by the plaintiff and must respond to the claims made against them.


Which issue reguarding slavery was resolved at the convention?

The issue of the Three-Fifths Compromise was resolved at the Constitutional Convention, which determined how slaves would be counted for the purpose of taxation and representation in Congress. The compromise stated that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.

Related questions

What page number from the cricuble did this quote come from but you must understand sir that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it there be no road in between?

94


In the crucible how does Danforth equate the court with the church?

Deputy Governor John Danforth states,that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it.


Why are the republicans against abortions and for the war in Iraq?

Before you are born, you are a person. After you are born you are no longer counted as a person other than fodder to fight wars.


Slaves were counted as what fraction of a person?

Slaves were counted as three-fifth's of a single person.


What did danforth try to say with this statement a person is either with this court or he or she must be counted against it their be no road between?

This is a sharp time, now, a precise time - we no longer live in the dusky afternoon when evil mixed itself with good and befuddled the world. Now, by God's grace, the shining sun is up, and them that fear not light will surely praise it. I hope you be one of those.


How were slaves counted in the population?

They were counted as three fifths of a person.


In the original system for counting population each slave was counted as?

They were counted as three-fifths of a person


What is the difference between being ambilevous and being ambidextrous?

An ambidextrous person is proficient with either hand. An ambilevous person is incompetent with either hand.


How where slaves going to be counted?

Slaves were to be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of apportioning seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, as per the Three-Fifths Compromise included in the United States Constitution. This compromise was included during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 as a way to balance the interests of states with differing numbers of enslaved individuals.


How were the slaves originally counted for representation on what basis?

counted as 3/4 of person


Why does this person hate me?

As we know nothing about either that person or you nor the history between the two you, we can give no answer to your question.


How were slaves to be counted when determing the number of congressional districts per state?

Slaves were counted by population by three-fifths of a person.