ping pang
== ==
The colonisation of Southern Rhodesia (as Zimbabwe was then ) had no particular effect on other countries.
Since colonization happened about 120 years ago, how do you think anyone would know that.
The first action towards the colonization of Zimbabwe was the Rudd Concession, which was pushed through by Cecil Rhodes in 1888. Once the British were mining in Zimbabwe, the order to take control was passed, which allowed British Officers to invade and take over.
Which of the following was not an economic effect of colonization? Global economic development
treaties were signed eg the mofart treate, globler treaty
Zimbabwe's economy is suffering due to an ineffective government.
Zimbabwe, when it was Rhodesia was a peaceful and prosperous place for everybody. A benign white rule - no dictatorship.
The effects of Spanish colonization in the Philippines included the introduction of Christianity, forced labor, and the establishment of a feudal system. Negative contributions included exploitation of resources, suppression of local culture, and social inequality. Positive contributions included the introduction of a written language, new crops and livestock, and the construction of infrastructure like schools and churches.
A lasting effect of the French colonization is that some Canadians still speak french language
The Dutch "Ethical Policy" had the interesting effect of increasing a strong sense of Indonesian pride.
Victoria Falls attracts many tourists to Zambia.
hi theiars no such thing by