answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The one that is thought to be the most true is the Ejected Ring Theory. This theory propose that a planetesimal (or small planet) the size of Mars struck the Earth just after the formation of the solar system, ejecting large volumes of heated material from the outer layers of both objects. A disk of orbiting material was formed, and this matter eventually stuck together to form the Moon in orbit around the Earth. This theory can explain why the Moon is made mostly of rock and how the rock was excessively heated. Furthermore, we see evidence in many places in the solar system that such collisions were common late in the formative stages of the solar system. In the mid-1970s, scientists proposed the giant impact scenario for the formation of the Moon. The idea was that an off-center impact of a roughly Mars-sized body with a young Earth could provide Earth with its fast initial spin, and eject enough debris into orbit to form the Moon. If the ejected material came primarily from the mantles of the Earth and the impactor, the lack of a sizeable lunar core was easily understood, and the energy of the impact could account for the extra heating of lunar material required by analysis of lunar rock samples obtained by the Apollo astronauts.

For nearly a decade, most scientists did not believe the giant impact theory. However, in 1984, a conference devoted to lunar origin prompted a critical comparison of the existing theories. The giant impact theory emerged from this conference with nearly consensus support by scientists, enhanced by new models of planet formation that suggested large impacts were actually quite common events in the late stages of terrestrial planet formation.

The basic idea is this: about 4.45 billion years ago, a young planet Earth - a mere 50 million years old at the time and not the solid object we know today - experienced the largest impact event of its history. Another planetary body with roughly the mass of Mars had formed nearby with an orbit that placed it on a collision course with Earth. When young Earth and this rogue body collided, the energy involved was 100 million times larger than the much later event believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs. The early giant collision destroyed the rogue body, likely vaporized the upper layers of Earth's mantle, and ejected large amounts of debris into Earth orbit. Our Moon formed from this debris.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What evidence is there for and against the ejected ring theory in terms of how the moon was formed?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the names of the way the moon formed?

The fission theory, the capture theory, the condensation theory, the colliding planetesimals theory and the ejected ring theory.


What are the names of the theorys of the way the moon formed?

The fission theory, the capture theory, the condensation theory, the colliding planetesimals theory and the ejected ring theory.


What is the evidence against Darwin's theory of evolution?

None exists.


If a scientific theory has been held as true for many years what will happen when a well monitored experiment gives evidence that seems to go against that theory?

If the evidence is accurate, it may disprove the theory.


What is the giant impact theory?

The giant impact theory that the moon formed when Earth collided with another object named Theia that was roughly the size of Mars. The debris ejected into space later came together to form the moon.


What is Giant Impact Theory?

The giant impact theory that the moon formed when Earth collided with another object named Theia that was roughly the size of Mars. The debris ejected into space later came together to form the moon.


When was the first concrete evidence found to support the theory that new ocean crust formed at vents in the ocean floor?

1977!


How the evidence of the chemical reactions demonstrated bonding theory.?

New compounds are obtained because new chemical bonds are formed.


Why do people preach evolution when it is just a theory?

Because non-scientists do not understand what a scientific theory actually means. It is not a random guess. Scientific theories are formed based on evidence and experimentation.The scientific community advocates evolution because all the evidence of life on our planet supports the theory.


What was the main counterargument against wegeners evidence?

Many scientists dismissed the theory because it flew in the face of conventional wisdom.


What evidence works against this theory of bigfoot is gigantopithecus?

There really isn't, except for the theory that Bigfoot is a guy in a gorilla suit (WHICH ISN'T TRUE, BIGFOOT LIVES!!!!)


Evidence that supports the theory of evolution is called?

"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.