0
According to Wikipedia;
"The Massacre of the Innocents is an episode of infanticide by Herod the Great that appears in the Gospel of Matthew (Matthew 2:16-18). It is not mentioned in the other gospels, nor does it figure in the early apocrypha, with the exception of the Protoevangelium of James 22.[1] Matthewrelates that King Herod ordered the execution of all young male children in the village of Bethlehem, so as to avoid the loss of his throne to a newborn "King of the Jews" whose birth had been announced to him by the Magi. Most modern biographers of Herod do not regard the massacre as an actual historical event.[2] Many scholars portray this and other nativity stories as creative hagiography rather than history. see related link below
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is the movie hamburger hill historically correct?
With the exceptions of the US M113 ACAVs and M41 Walker Bulldog light tanks, it was as "historically" correct as funding and script/military technical advisors could make it. The M113s should have had ACAV sets on them (if they were missing) and the US didn't use M41 Bulldog tanks, the ARVNs did; but it is understandable that the producers couldn't get ahold of M48 Patton tanks. Full Metal Jacket was the same way, they used M41 tanks too, when they were supposed to be M48 Pattons. Also, "Full Metal Jacket" was less historically correct than Hamburger Hill was.
What is the adverb of historic?
historically
Is Julius Caesar mentioned in the Bible?
Certainly not by name, although some may find him by allusion, and since this is open to various interpretations the correct answer would be a simple no.
What term is used to mean the colleges that were started for African American students?
Historically Black Colleges and Universities
Who were some historically important people in the 1830s?
frefega
Was the united monarchy of David and Solomon which is described by the Bible as a regional power historically correct?
No. there are no historical record or archaeological evidence outside the Bible that the alleged United Empire of King David and King Solomon were a force to recon with.
Is Assassins Creed historically correct?
No, but somewhat..
What movies on astronomy are historically correct?
There are no movies that depict astronomy accurately.
How do you spell traditionally?
That is the correct spelling of the adverb "traditionally" (historically, by custom).
Protestant Bible and Catholic Bible which is correct?
the Catholic Bible Actually, both are correct. However, the Protestants threw out a bunch of books of the Bible that did not fit with their teachings that are still recognized by Catholics as canonical. Therefore, the Catholic Bible is 'more correct.'
How does the Bible disprove the attacks by its enemies?
A:As long as the enemies of the Bible accept the truth of the Bible, it is relatively easy to turn back attacks on the Bible simply by quoting chapter and verse to prove the Bible correct. Some critics, although not necessarily enemies of the Bible, describe this as circular reasoning, because it relies on the Bible to be correct, in order to prove it to be correct. One response to this is to take biblical passages that are confirmed by non-biblical sources, and use this evidence to prove the entire Bible correct and wholly inerrant. Unfortunately, some critics persist and say that no one ever claimed the Bible is never historically correct, just that it is not always so and furthermore that there is no evidence that it is spiritually correct. Although we can never actually prove the Bible to be spiritually correct, we can seek to divert these attacks by pointing to prophecies in the Bible. If prophecies can be shown to be true, then the Bible must have been inspired by God. The rub is that believers accept the prophecies to be true, but time and again sceptics point to reasons to doubt the very fact of those prophecies.In the end, we can use the Bible and faith to disprove biblical criticism in our own minds, but we can never really disprove these attacks in the minds of a well-informed critic.
What is the distinction you have to make when reading the Bible?
To truly understand the Bible you need to make a distinction between what is historically true and what is purely inspirational.
Are Baptists Bible wrong?
No everything in the BIBLE is correct!
When scientific knowledge is correct it will fit Bible-derived?
When scientific knowledge is correct, it will fit the Bible-derived framework.
Can it be correct to capitalize both Study and Bible in Study Bible?
absolutely
Where can one find historically correct Vikings pictures?
The best place to find historically correct Vikings pictures, would be at the Smithsonian Museum. The Smithsonian is located in Washington DC. So if you are wanting the most accurate pictures that is the place that I would suggest for someone.
What is the Gaelic for 'Rachael'?
The Irish Bible has Ráchael.In Scottish Gaelic Raonaid and Raghnaid are considered equivalentsalthough not historically connected.
