0
What internal evidence was cities for the support of Solomon as the author of Ecclesiastes?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
One internal evidence that supports Solomon as the author of Ecclesiastes is his self-identification in the book as the son of David and king over Israel. Additionally, the wisdom, wealth, and experience described in the book align with Solomon's life and reign. The writing style and language used in Ecclesiastes also resemble other writings traditionally attributed to Solomon.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What books of the Bible were written during the reigns of David and Solomon?
Psalms, Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes. See also:http://judaism.answers.com/hebrew/does-archaeology-support-the-hebrew-biblehttp://religion.answers.com/theory/debunking-the-jepd-documentary-hypothesis
What does corroborate mean?
Corroborate means to strengthen or support with evidence.
What is required of an audit?
the public accountant obtain an understanding of internal control, assess internal control, assess fraud risk, and obtain corroborating evidence to support the figures shown in the included set of financial statements.
What would people give Solomon for his wisdom?
A: The defining legend of Solomon was his great wisdom, gifted to him by God. The Bible says that he was the wisest of kings. No doubt some people would give a great deal to Solomon in return for his wisdom. However (if it were possible) that might not be a wise thing to do. The story of the two mothers is the only biblical account that purports to show Solomon's wisdom. Soon after God granted Solomon wisdom, two women asked for judgement over the ownership of a small baby. In this episode, Solomon gave his most famous judgement. The reader is expected to agree with Solomon when he knew that only one woman would be willing to give up her claim to the child rather than have it killed, and that woman could only have been the birth mother. By today's standards, I don't think this story stands out as an example of extraordinary wisdom. According to the Bible, Solomon showed much more evidence of a lack of wisdom, including in the way he overtaxed the people of Israel to support his sumptuous lifestyle, resulting in the Israelites ceding from his kingdom when Solomon's son and successor, Rehoboam, refused to reduce the tax burden. The Jewish people needed a glorious past, with both great and wise rulers, and Solomon became part of that past. So, although not actually a wise ruler on the biblical evidence, he was a wise ruler in tradition. To support this tradition, the Books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes and even some Psalms were eventually attributed to King Solomon, although scholars can readily prove that they were actually compiled after the Babylonian Exile.
Why does scientific evidence support scientific theories?
use scientific evidence to support your answer
The response of each society to European imperialism grew out of its larger historical development and its internal problems What evidence might support this statement?
p e n i s
What question should a writer ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
Where were the wise sayings of king Solomon written down?
A:The defining legend of Solomon was his great wisdom, gifted to him by God. If there ever was a King Solomon, the Bible says that he was the wisest of kings. Finding specific biblical examples of his wisdom proves difficult. In fact, the story of the two mothers is the only biblical account that purports to show Solomon's wisdom. Soon after God granted Solomon wisdom, two women asked for judgement over the ownership of a small baby. In this episode, Solomon gave his most famous judgement. The reader is expected to agree with Solomon when he knew that only one woman would be willing to give up her claim to the child rather than have it killed, and that woman could only have been the birth mother.The Jewish people needed a glorious past, with both great and wise rulers, and Solomon became part of that past. So, although not actually a wise ruler on the biblical evidence, he was a wise ruler in tradition. To support this tradition, the Books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes and even some Psalms were eventually attributed to King Solomon, although scholars can readily prove that they were actually compiled after the Babylonian Exile.
Where were the wise sayings of Solomon written down?
A:The defining legend of Solomon was his great wisdom, gifted to him by God. If there ever was a King Solomon, The Bible says that he was the wisest of kings. Finding specific biblical examples of his wisdom proves difficult. In fact, the story of the two mothers is the only biblical account that purports to show Solomon's wisdom. Soon after God granted Solomon wisdom, two women asked for judgement over the ownership of a small baby. In this episode, Solomon gave his most famous judgement. The reader is expected to agree with Solomon when he knew that only one woman would be willing to give up her claim to the child rather than have it killed, and that woman could only have been the birth mother.The Jewish people needed a glorious past, with both great and wise rulers, and Solomon became part of that past. So, although not actually a wise ruler on the biblical evidence, he was a wise ruler in tradition. To support this tradition, the Books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes and even some Psalms were eventually attributed to King Solomon, although scholars can readily prove that they were actually compiled after the Babylonian Exile.
History Channel show Bible Unearthed 4 suggests that there is no evidence that David and Solomon have a big army and populace to support a Kingdom True or False?
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The assertion of a lack of evidence does not prove anything, nor does putting the relevant people in the incorrect time frame of reference. History channel is deceptive and anti-Biblical for failing to point out these biases.Short : Possibly true. What does it prove:nothing.
Which question would best help a writer choose evidence to support a claim?
Does this evidence support what I am trying to say
Did the addition of molecular evidence support or refute the hypothesis that you made earlier based on structural evidence only?
support
