It's still worth about $4.50 for the silver, a 1965 is 40% silver but the plating adds nothing to the value unless someone wants it.
No, they are worth no more than the metal (or face) value of the coin, the gold plating adds so little gold that it would cost more to de-plate the coin than the gold is worth. For example, a 1965 gold plated half dollar would be worth ~$4.50 in silver scrap just like a normal 1965 half dollar. A 2002 gold plated quarter would be worth just a quarter, just like a normal 2002 quarter.
It's only gold plated. It's worth around $4 and maybe a few cents extra for the gold plating.
Not gold and not plated. It's made of manganese brass. (And yes, it's worth something: it's worth one dollar.)
One hundred dollars
$1. It's been gold plated, not struck in gold.
One hundred dollars
It's a gold plated novelty coin that just a dollar plus the 3 cents worth of gold
The US has NOT made a gold one dollar coin since 1889. The coin you have is a just a gold plated 1977 Eisenhower dollar that's only worth a dollar unless you find someone that wants it.
Gold plating adds no value when it comes to coins and indeed is a form of damage. A gold plated coin is worth the same as a damaged example of that coin. For example, a gold plated 1964 half dollar is worth the $7 in melt that a normal damaged 1964 half dollar is worth. A gold plated 1971 half dollar is worth 50 cents just like a damaged 1971 half dollar is worth.
It is only gold plated which adds no extra value. Since it is a gold plated coin it is considered altered and is worth face value.
It's not gold plated the Brass in the coin gives it that color and it's not worth more than a dollar
$1 or more.