Id say the impreza wrx sti there a little bit higher off the ground and the symmetrical all wheel drive on them can move the car up a slippery hill when only one wheel has traction, you can check on you tube of a legacy with the same system doing it on an incline.. but i might be a bit biased because i own a Subaru wrx :P
subaru
lancer is better..
toyota corolla
there competition with each other personally im a sti fan most people thin evo is better but i bag to differ
Most car enthusiasts would choose the Lancer. Mitsubishi tends to produce higher quality vehicles.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 2011 is better than a Ford Mustang GT 2011.
Depends what you term as 'better' - having driven both many times I would say that for pure driving 'fun' the Subaru is better because it doesn't have so many gizmo's on, it therefore leaving you to do the driving. If you're not confident in your abilities of driving on the edge, the Mitsi is better because its more forgiving due to it's gizmo's (anti-yaw, type of surface selection, etc).
is under air filter box pull out to see better
The Mitsubishi Montero is okay for offroad driving. It is by no means even close to being ideal for it. You're better off looking for a well equipped American built 4x4 Truck.
Both cars are good cars, I myself happen to own the WRX, and love it. However in C&D and R&T tests both cars go back and forth between which one is better almost every other year. Usually the difference in track times is between .1 and .3 seconds. I guess what I'm saying is which one do you think looks better?
Mitsubishi shogun is the better 4x4 from Toyota and Mitsubishi
What do you think? mitsubishi