Want this question answered?
Ethics
Yes!
Impartiality, in short, as an obligation of justice, may be said to mean, being exclusively influenced by the considerations which it is supposed ought to influence. Some people hold that utilitarianism is incompatible with justice and objectionable for considerations of incentives qualify the claim is thus the norm of justice. Aside from the justice versus utility issue, chapter 5 is of interest for another.
The past tense of ought is ought.
Ought is already acceptable in past tense. 'Ought to be' is present tense, while 'Ought to have been' or 'Ought to have' is past tense.
Consumers' cooperative is ought to provide quality goods and services at the lowest cost to the consumer/owners alike.producer cooperatives help in creation of jobs hence help alleviate poverty
Cowboys loved a colorful phrase! This meant by rights, by strict justice. "By good rights, you ought to be dead," said the cowboy.
A sentence with the word ought in it is: "I ought to be a superstar someday!"
Triple ...
Consumers' cooperative is ought to provide quality goods and services at the lowest cost to the consumer/owners alike.producer cooperatives help in creation of jobs hence help alleviate poverty
The antonym of "ought" in the sense of should is "shouldn't" or "ought not:""Jack ought to have joined in the fun.""No, he shouldn't have joined in if it wasn't fun for him."
"You ought to be doing your homework."