Neither is safer. they are two different ways of achieving the same thing i.e. compressing the air being fed into an engine. A supercharger uses engine power and is less efficient, but responds quicker. A turbocharger uses exhaust gas pressure, but there is a time lag penalty.
No, as long as the boost is kept to a safe limit.
I am a used car wholesaler and although I do not know about a 2004 I have seen 98s-01s with 145k or more that the supercharger is still in great working condition so i feel it would be a safe purchase.
The 2005 SRT6 crossfire had a supercharger, would need to get injectors, programmer/chipand atleast a pulley to low the boost to a safe level, but would be the best bet. Not too many aftermarket ones avail. due to the low production #'s.
Usually Classic Motor Auctions is a good website for that and I've heard many say it was safe. But If you don't believe me, you should ask some friends with more experience.
It is still safe to reuse used motor homes. However, you may have to purchase extra insurance to cover all your bases. The best protection is to purchase used motor homes from reputable and reliable dealers.
Yes, to a certain degree. Actually the SSEi trim level comes stock with a supercharger.
To provide safe & sound journey
yes Gasoline is not a safe cleaner.
"This would depend on where your local dealer is. If your local dealer is still in business, then I would say it is a safe assumption that there are motor cars still available there. If they have gone out of business, then it would be safe to assume that no motor cars are available there."
The safe operating range of the motor should be printed somewhere on the exterior of the motor.
i think it shouldbe safe gap .45
NoNo