cross cutting relationship
Yes
That depends! If the fault line cross cuts the igneous intrusion causing the intrusion to be displaced on either side of the fault and forming a broken mass of rock within the intrusion known as a fault breccia then the fault is younger than the intrusions, as the intrusion must have already existed for the fault to cause it's displacement. If on the other hand the igneous intrusion cross cuts the fault and is un-deformed then it is probable that it is younger than the fault.
One is not necessarily older than the other. It depends on the context. A fault running through any rock must be younger than that rock.
California, Nevada, and Oregon are no fault states. If you need a complete list of all the fifty states that are no fault or driver fault states you can ask an insurance agent.
well love is a boy and a girl together ...........like meh3>
In a reverse fault the maximum principal stress is horizontal, compression causes reverse (thrust) faults.
How could the rock be faulted if it came after the faulting? It wouldn't be there to fault. So therefore, what ever the fault cuts through, it must be younger than it in order for it to be able to cut the rock in the first place.
older because it is at the bottom and the ones on top are younger than the bottoms
older because it is at the bottom and the ones on top are younger than the bottoms
The fault will be younger than the rocks it faulted (cross-cutting relationships).
100 year old
100 year old