basically someone who is FOR large companies/ countries making excessive profits by finding the cheapest labour (asian/african countries in particular), materials and selling a product for a profit. this is a very capitalist idea and companies include Ford, McDonalds, MATTEL etc p.s. read a book if you really want to enhance your understanding a more likely grades...
He had an argument with Isaac Newton.
A weak argument is s choice of the end of the day. A strong argument is for many days
no, because the argument is all rolled together
I believe you mean "With whom did Robert Hook famously have an argument?"
As far as I understand, the Big Bang theory is not a challenge to the cosmological argument at all. The cosmological argument states that there must have been a beginning to the universe, which is confirmed by modern science. The cosmological argument further is often held to indicate that that beginning must have been an intelligent agent, which is neither confirmed nor denied by cosmology.
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.
Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
an argument with information
argument
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.
The claim is the argument you plan to prove.
The design argument, which posits that the complexity and order in the universe suggest a designer, is convincing to some people because it provides a logical explanation for the existence of complex systems. However, others find it unconvincing due to alternative explanations, like natural selection, and the lack of direct evidence for a designer. Ultimately, the persuasiveness of the design argument can vary depending on an individual's perspective and beliefs.