There's a LOT of confusion about the "Three-fifths" clause in the Constitution.
Article I Section 2 of the Constitution states: "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."
The Southern states wanted to count slaves as "people" for the purpose of Congressional representation, but NOT count them as "people" as having any rights. This would increase the power and influence of the white people in the South, because they would have more US representatives than the North would.
The Abolitionist Northern states didn't want to count slaves at all for the purpose of Congressional representation; if the slaves couldn't vote for their own representatives, the North didn't want them to be represented by white southern slave owners.
As always, they compromised. The number of slaves and other "non-free" people were counted as "three-fifths" for Congressional apportionment and taxes, and Indians, who were not taxed at all, weren't counted.
Three fifts compromise
was slaves counted as people or property
How would slaves be counted for in population, voting and taxing. It was chosen that an African American Slave would be counted as 3/5 of a person in terms of taxation and representation.
The Three-Fifths Compromise this compromise ment that for every 5 slaves 3 of them would be counted for taxation and representation.
This agreement was made in the original US Constitution, and is generally referred to as "The Great Compromise." The North didn't think that slaves should be counted at all, and the South thought that each slave should be counted as a full person. The reason for the argument was that representation in the house of representatives was based on population and each side wanted to be the majority.
Three fifts compromise
The Three-Fifths Compromise.
was slaves counted as people or property
Do your work
Northern states objected because enslaved people were legally considered property. So, some argued that as property, Slaves should be counted for taxation but not representations.
Three-fifths of a state's slave population counted toward representation and taxation.
How would slaves be counted for in population, voting and taxing. It was chosen that an African American Slave would be counted as 3/5 of a person in terms of taxation and representation.
Laws that determined states' slave populations would be counted as 3/5th of the entire population for representation in Congress and taxation purposes.
why goods r not assets
Three-fifths compromise
The issue of the Three-Fifths Compromise was resolved at the Constitutional Convention, which determined how slaves would be counted for the purpose of taxation and representation in Congress. The compromise stated that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.
Slaves should not be counted as property for tax purposes. Slavery is a violation of human rights and treating slaves as property perpetuates their dehumanization. It is important to address the systemic issues surrounding slavery rather than integrating it into taxation systems.