answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There's a LOT of confusion about the "Three-fifths" clause in the Constitution.

Article I Section 2 of the Constitution states: "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."

The Southern states wanted to count slaves as "people" for the purpose of Congressional representation, but NOT count them as "people" as having any rights. This would increase the power and influence of the white people in the South, because they would have more US representatives than the North would.

The Abolitionist Northern states didn't want to count slaves at all for the purpose of Congressional representation; if the slaves couldn't vote for their own representatives, the North didn't want them to be represented by white southern slave owners.

As always, they compromised. The number of slaves and other "non-free" people were counted as "three-fifths" for Congressional apportionment and taxes, and Indians, who were not taxed at all, weren't counted.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the agreement of slaves should be counted as a percentage for purpose of taxation and financial support?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What agreement determined the guidelines by which enslaved persons would be counted for purpose of taxation and representation?

Three fifts compromise


What agreement detrmined the guidelines by which enslaved persons would be counted for purposes of taxation and representation?

The Three-Fifths Compromise.


Was slaves counted as part of the population for representation as property for taxation?

was slaves counted as people or property


Three out of every five slaves would be counted for population and taxation?

Do your work


Why did some northern delegates argue that enslaved people should be counted for taxation but not representation?

Northern states objected because enslaved people were legally considered property. So, some argued that as property, Slaves should be counted for taxation but not representations.


What is the main idea of three fifths compromise?

Three-fifths of a state's slave population counted toward representation and taxation.


Which political question was addressed by the Three -Fifths Compromise?

How would slaves be counted for in population, voting and taxing. It was chosen that an African American Slave would be counted as 3/5 of a person in terms of taxation and representation.


What are three fifth laws?

Laws that determined states' slave populations would be counted as 3/5th of the entire population for representation in Congress and taxation purposes.


Why are used goods financial assets and government assets not counted as GDP expenditures?

why goods r not assets


What agreement determined how slaves would be counted for representation and placed a ban on asking for an end to the slave trade.?

Three-fifths compromise


Which issue reguarding slavery was resolved at the convention?

The issue of the Three-Fifths Compromise was resolved at the Constitutional Convention, which determined how slaves would be counted for the purpose of taxation and representation in Congress. The compromise stated that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.


Should slaves be counted as a property tax?

Slaves should not be counted as property for tax purposes. Slavery is a violation of human rights and treating slaves as property perpetuates their dehumanization. It is important to address the systemic issues surrounding slavery rather than integrating it into taxation systems.